Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
🙌 It's Here: the Only Stock Screener You'll Ever Need Get Started

Some countries have resisted 1.5°C goal in COP27 text, US says

Published Nov 12, 2022 10:36AM ET Updated Nov 12, 2022 12:10PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. John Kerry, U.S. Special Envoy for Climate speaks as he attends the opening of the American Pavilion in the COP27 climate summit in Egypt's Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt November 8, 2022. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem

By Valerie Volcovici

SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt (Reuters) - A few countries have resisted mentioning a global goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius in the official text of the COP27 summit in Egypt, U.S. Special Climate Envoy John Kerry said at the conference on Saturday.

"You're absolutely correct. There are very few countries, but a few, that have raised the issue of not mentioning this word or that word," Kerry said when asked about opposition by some governments to mentioning the 1.5C target.

"But the fact is that, in Glasgow that was adopted, the language is there. And I know ... Egypt doesn't intend to be the country that hosts a retreat from what was achieved in Glasgow," Kerry said, referring to last year's COP summit in Scotland.

World governments agreed in 2015 during a U.N. summit in France to try to limit the average global temperature increase to 1.5C, a deal dubbed the Paris Agreement that was seen as a breakthrough in international climate ambition.

Greenhouse gas emissions have been rising ever since, however, and scientists say the world risks missing the target without swift and deep cuts. Breaching the 1.5C threshold risks unleashing the worst consequences of global warming.

Already, the world has warmed more than 1.1C from the preindustrial average temperature - fueling extreme weather that is already delivering steep economic losses.

Many developing countries have demanded the establishment of a "loss and damage" fund that could disperse cash to countries struggling to recover from disasters.

Kerry said the United States would not support establishing such a fund, and instead believed existing platforms should be used.

"It's a well known fact that the United States and many other countries will not establish ... some sort of legal structure that is tied to compensation or liability. That's just not happening," he said.

"We will find a way, I am confident, to be able to have financial arrangements that reflect the reality of how we are all going to deal with the climate crisis."

Democratic lawmakers spent the last few days at the summit trying to bolster the U.S. commitment to its climate goals, and reassure countries that Washington will deliver on promises pledged at previous climate summits.

They touted the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in Congress, which unleashed over $300 billion in climate-related domestic spending.

They added they would push to pass legislation allowing Biden to deliver on $11.4 billion in a climate finance pledge he made at the Glasgow climate talks last year.

That task could be complicated in a politically divided Congress.

Congressman John Curtis (R-Utah), who is leading a delegation of Republicans at the summit, told Reuters that he opposed climate aid.

"The US writing a check wont solve problems," he said.

He said he supported policies that expand production and access to natural gas, and the development of new clean energy technologies.

Some countries have resisted 1.5°C goal in COP27 text, US says
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (7)
William Smith
William Smith Nov 12, 2022 5:35PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
So a recent volcanic eruption emits more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than all of mankind in man's history. But it's such an inconvenient fact that it is off limits to ever be mentioned by the press and tools like Kerry. Also, all volcanic eruptions have basically the same effect, for 4 billion years. Is the climate changing? Of course, been changing for 4 billion years.
William Smith
William Smith Nov 12, 2022 2:35PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Wow, Reuters going out of their way to censor counter arguments to this woke propaganda. Won't let me post.
Peter Agh
Peter Agh Nov 12, 2022 1:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
There are 12.000 ans 24000 year cycles earth going through with Ice age preceeding increase of temperature. These ldiots have no ideas, just Clinton and hreen guys business.
Alex Malmstrom
Alex Malmstrom Nov 12, 2022 11:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
And the fairy tale continues with Frankenstein perpetuating the fear propaganda!
oeg vokar
oeg vokar Nov 12, 2022 11:24AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
So if we don't stop climate change to 1.5 degrees, even though the Earth's climate has been changing for the last 4 billion years, will Kerry pay back the trillions they've already taken?
oeg vokar
oeg vokar Nov 12, 2022 11:24AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Or will he simply enjoy life and the naivety of the masses
Roger Miller
Roger Miller Nov 12, 2022 11:09AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Climate damage should be offset by those doing the damage, but government should keep their role to a minimum. So far they have done nothing but waste billions. Just go back and review Obama's promises and policies.
oeg vokar
oeg vokar Nov 12, 2022 11:09AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
There is a scientific process called photosynthesis, in which every living plant on earth needs CO2, heat and water. Could you explain to me how reducing CO2 makes the planet cleaner and greener? Because you won't be able to, go to school
Arno Pfohl
JackR3acher Nov 12, 2022 10:50AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Well with the current economic costs, what do you expect. Fuel supply, housing and food costs are at all time high... And now you want country economies to suffer at what expense? totally out of touch reality and delusional politicians...
William Smith
William Smith Nov 12, 2022 10:50AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Jack, they are not out of touch. Those folks like Kerry, Gore and hundreds of elites like them are getting filthy rich off of the propaganda they propagate.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email