Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Bipartisan group of U.S. senators says it has a deal on infrastructure framework

EconomyJun 11, 2021 05:07AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) faces reporters after the weekly Senate Republican caucus policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., June 8, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein 2/2

By David Morgan and Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A bipartisan group of 10 U.S. senators said on Thursday it had reached agreement on a framework for a proposed infrastructure spending bill that would not include any tax increases.

The group of five Republicans and five Democrats gave no details, but a source familiar with the deal said it would cost $974 billion over five years and $1.2 trillion over eight years, and includes $579 billion in new spending.

The senators said they were discussing their approach with their colleagues and the White House, and they were optimistic about getting broad support.

"Our group ... has worked in good faith and reached a bipartisan agreement on a realistic, compromise framework to modernize our nation's infrastructure and energy technologies," the lawmakers said in a statement. "This investment would be fully paid for and not include tax increases."

The agreement proposes using unspent COVID-19 funds and raising revenue to fund infrastructure investments by indexing the federal tax on gasoline to account for inflation, a congressional source familiar with the negotiations said.

The White House said it would work with the senators to address questions about policy and funding. A person familiar with President Joe Biden's thinking said the White House opposed any effort to index gasoline taxes to inflation.

Democratic U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said earlier on Thursday he was open to a bipartisan infrastructure bill but wanted to see it in writing. He added he might also push for a follow-up package that had only his party's support.

Biden, a Democrat, has been pushing for a sweeping $1.7 trillion package in Congress to revamp roads and bridges and tackle such other issues as education and home healthcare.

His plan has faced Republican opposition and Biden earlier this week rejected a far smaller counter-proposal put forward by Republican Senator Shelley Moore Capito.

That left room for the group of 10 moderate senators from the two parties to pitch a new idea designed to generate enough support to pass through the 100-seat Senate with the 60 votes necessary for most bills.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell also told the group he was open to their ideas, Republicans said.

Schumer said work was still progressing on two tracks - one a bipartisan infrastructure bill and the other a measure that if brought to the floor, could pass with only Democratic votes through a maneuver called reconciliation that bypasses the rule requiring 60 votes for bills to advance.

MCCONNELL IN 'LISTENING MODE'

The senators in the group that reached the agreement are Democrats Joe Manchin, Jeanne Shaheen, Kyrsten Sinema, Jon Tester and Mark Warner, and Republicans Bill Cassidy, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rob Portman and Mitt Romney.

Collins told Reuters the group met with McConnell and he was in a "listening mode," but did not commit one way or the other.

Romney and Tester spoke of a provision that might raise revenue by having the Internal Revenue Service go after tax cheats.

At the same time, infrastructure-related transportation bills moved forward at the congressional committee level.

A House of Representatives panel on Thursday ended more than 17 hours of debate with a 38-26 vote authorizing $547 billion in additional spending for surface transportation.

The Senate Commerce Committee was also set to unveil a $78 billion surface transportation bill, sources said.

Republicans say Biden's infrastructure plan puts too much money into addressing climate change and building up some social programs. They also oppose his proposal to raise taxes on U.S. corporations and the wealthy to pay for it.

The bipartisan push has come under fire from some Democrats who say Republicans are narrowly focused on physical infrastructure and that Biden should push ahead with his own plans without watering it down in negotiations.

The Senate is split 50-50 between the two parties, although Vice President Kamala Harris can cast a tie-breaking vote.

Bipartisan group of U.S. senators says it has a deal on infrastructure framework
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (4)
Me comment
Me comment Jun 10, 2021 8:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Take the deal, pass it, then through reconciliation pass what Biden really wants while reversing the gas tax increase and replace it with taxing corporations and the rich! Win Win.
Hung Pham
Hung Pham Jun 10, 2021 8:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Tax the rich cuz you lazy and poor right lol
Me comment
Me comment Jun 10, 2021 3:27PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Don't go for it all your doing is making a tax increase for the low and middle-class, something Biden said he would not do.
Ahmed Shahzad
Ahmed Shahzad Jun 10, 2021 10:48AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
shahzad
dc Gpswill
dc Gpswill Jun 10, 2021 10:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
we dont care about Mitch! his last term
Ahmed Shahzad
Ahmed Shahzad Jun 10, 2021 10:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
03028039842
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email