Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Quarles Says Fed Should Have Hiked Rates Before Taper Finished

Published 07/18/2022, 02:29 PM
Updated 07/18/2022, 02:45 PM
© Bloomberg. Randal Quarles, vice chairman of supervision at the U.S. Federal Reserve, speaks during the American Bar Association Banking Law Committee annual meeting in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, Jan. 17, 2020. The Federal Reserve is shifting its focus from writing and revising rules aimed at limiting risk in the banking system to a concentration on how lenders interpret the restrictions, Quarles said.

(Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve should have started hiking interest rates before it was done tapering its bond purchases to avoid falling behind on the fight against inflation, Randal Quarles, the Fed’s former vice chair for supervision, said.

Policy makers were focused on unwinding the central bank’s asset purchases in a predictable manner to avoid disrupting markets, Quarles said during an interview with the Macro Musings podcast published Monday by the Mercatus Center. 

Fed officials generally prefer to stop asset purchases -- which are designed to add support to the economy -- before raising rates, which remove support, to avoid sending mixed signals, he said. But officials should have made an exception and started raising rates last fall, once it became clear that inflation was more broad based and the labor market was tightening. 

“I think that in those circumstances, for a limited period of time, to have said, ‘Yes, tapering the balance sheet has to happen over an extended period of time to avoid disrupting markets, but we’re going to begin raising interest rates even before that taper is complete because now is the time to move more aggressively in the response to inflation,’ I think that would’ve been wise,” Quarles said.

Fed watchers have criticized the central bank for being slow to respond to inflation, and policy makers have acknowledged that their forecasts missed how persistent and wide-reaching the price increases would be. 

Officials began tapering asset purchases in November and wrapped the process up in March -- when they began raising rates -- and have turned progressively more hawkish in the following months to curb rampant inflation.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The central bank is now trying to catch up by aggressively raising rates and shrinking its balance sheet. Officials hiked by 75 basis points last month, the largest increase since 1994, and signaled they are likely to do the same again when they meet next week. 

Bond traders and investment banks speculated that the Fed could take the more drastic move of raising rates by 100 basis points at the July 26-27 gathering, after data showed consumer prices rose 9.1% for the year through June, a fresh 40-year high. But policy makers pushed back against that possibility, saying that a 75 basis-point hike would still be a large move and expressed caution about the risks of super-sized increases.

Quarles, who left the Fed in December after his term as vice chair had expired, said he thinks officials were slowed down last year by concerns over how markets might react when they began slowing down asset purchases. The so-called “taper tantrum” of 2013, when bond yields surged and risky assets sank after then-Fed Chair Ben Bernanke hinted that the central bank may soon start to reduce its asset purchases, was top of mind, Quarles said. 

“The lesson of the taper tantrum under Bernanke was that you’ve got to telegraph that well in advance. You’ve got to do that gradually, in order to avoid disrupting markets,” he said. 

Quarles previously said in May that the central bank should have begun tightening in September, but officials may have been delayed by uncertainty over President Joe Biden’s decisions on Fed leadership. He also said then that he believed it would be difficult for the Fed to bring inflation under control without tipping the economy into recession.  

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.