Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
🙌 It's Here: the Only Stock Screener You'll Ever Need Get Started

Hermès vs. MetaBirkins Verdict Announced, the Design House Wins

Published Feb 09, 2023 01:15PM ET Updated Feb 09, 2023 02:30PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
Hermès vs. MetaBirkins Verdict Announced, the Design House Wins
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio

  • The trial between Hermès and MetaBirkins has concluded in favor of the French fashion luxury brand.
  • The jury awarded over $100,000 in damages to the fashion house, settling that the NFT artist profited off Hermès’ goodwill by producing NFTs based on the brand’s iconic Birkin bags.
After a year-long trademark battle, the nine-person jury in the copyright infringement trial between Hermès and the 28-year-old NFT artist and creator of MetaBirkins, Mason Rothschild, has concluded in favor of the design house.

The jury decided that Rothschild’s NFTs diluted the fashion luxury brand and misled consumers into thinking the two brands were related.

Quick Recap

Mason Rothschild released a collection of 100 furry digital handbags called MetaBirkins in December 2021. Rothschild’s NFT collection paid homage to Hermès’ signature luxury handbag, Birkin, and extended on Rothschild’s successful NFT artwork, Baby Birkin, which raked in 5.5 ETH at an auction.

Rothschild shared that his project, MetaBirkins, was inspired by the acceleration of the fur-free initiatives in fashion and the rise of alternative textiles. At release, each MetaBirkins costs 0.1 ETH.

However, a month later, in January 2022, Hermès International filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against the budding artist, claiming that Rothschild stole the goodwill in Hermès’ IP to create and sell his line of products.

The NFT project reportedly made over $1 million in sales by January, despite Hermès sending a cease and desist letter in December 2021.

In response to the lawsuit, Rothschild justified his view on the MetaBirkins Twitter account, claiming he was not selling or creating fake Birkin Bags but instead ‘artworks’ depicting luxury bags covered in fur. Rothschild added that the First Amendment protected his NFTs.

.tweet-container,.twitter-tweet.twitter-tweet-rendered,blockquote.twitter-tweet{min-height:261px}.tweet-container{position:relative}blockquote.twitter-tweet{display:flex;max-width:550px;margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px}blockquote.twitter-tweet p{font:20px -apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif}.tweet-container div:first-child{ position:absolute!Important }.tweet-container div:last-child{ position:relative!Important }

No Bags for You

After a year of defending himself against the trademark infringement allegations, the lawsuit came to trial on January 30th.

The case reportedly utilized the Rogers (NYSE:ROG) test to examine the balance between artistic expression and trademark infringement. During the trial, Hermès and Rothschild questioned trademark law and NFTs. Moreover, Experts provided testimonies focused on consumer confusion and brand dilution.

However, despite the artist’s justification, the jury did not pay heed and sided with Hermès. In the final verdict, the jury decided Rothschild’s NFTs were not subject to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as the artist’s lawyers claimed.

In their closing arguments, Hermès’ trial team shared Rothschild’s Meta Birkin NFTs misled consumers into believing the two brands were colluding. Moreover, the lawyers asserted that using the Birkin name in the NFT collection diluted the Hermès brand.

The jury awarded $133,000 in damages to Hermès, siding with the fashion brand’s lawyers.

In response to the verdict, Rothschild shared his disagreement on Twitter, claiming the case will set a negative precedent for artists in the future surrounding creativity and intellectual property.

On the Flipside

  • Rothschild’s defense team summoned Dr. David Neal, managing partner and founder of Catalyst Behavioral Sciences, and Dr. Bruce Isaacson to determine if there was any confusion between Hermès’ Birkin bags and MetaBirkins NFTs. Dr. Neal’s results showed that 9.3% of those tested were confused between the two brands.
  • Hermès’ Birkin Bags range from $12,000 to $200,000. MetaBirkins initially sold the NFTs for $450 each. Rothschild reportedly made around 55.2 ETH or approximately $90,000 at press time.

Why You Should Care

The MetaBirkins vs. Hermès case is the first and most prominent lawsuit examining trademarks and NFTs. The lawsuit brought into question whether trademark rights extended to the digital sphere. The verdict will set a legal precedent for trademarks, NFT creators, NFTs, and digital creators in the future, building a framework for intellectual property that the space lacks.

While Hermès has yet to establish its presence in Web3, read how its rival, Gucci, is:

Gucci Sets up Shop in The Sandbox Metaverse, Bringing Games, Vintage Fashion, and More.

You may also like:

TOP 5 Fashion Brands Trailblazing in Web3.

See original on DailyCoin

Hermès vs. MetaBirkins Verdict Announced, the Design House Wins

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your profile, will be public on and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email