Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Black Friday SALE: Up to 54% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

Chainalysis: FTX Crisis Comparatively Smaller Than Mt. Gox’s

Cryptocurrency Nov 24, 2022 08:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Chainalysis: FTX Crisis Comparatively Smaller Than Mt. Gox’s
 
BTC/USD
-0.41%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
UNIs/USD
-1.08%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

  • Chainalysis concluded that FTX was a far lesser player in the cryptocurrency market than Mt. Gox was.
  • The first Bitcoin exchange, Mt. Gox, crashed in 2014, yet crypto survived.
  • “There’s no reason to think the industry can’t bounce back from this, stronger than ever.”
Chainalysis, a company that analyzes blockchain data, draws parallels between the collapse of FTX and that of Mt. Gox to predict the effects of such a tragedy on the cryptocurrency ecosystem as a whole.

The research lead at Chainalysis, Eric Jardine, recently compared the two firms’ market shares in a Twitter thread on November 23. He discovered that in the year preceding Mt. Gox’s implosion in 2014, the exchange attracted an average of 46% of all inflows, whereas FTX received an average of 13% from 2019 to 2022.

.tweet-container,.twitter-tweet.twitter-tweet-rendered,blockquote.twitter-tweet{min-height:261px}.tweet-container{position:relative}blockquote.twitter-tweet{display:flex;max-width:550px;margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px}blockquote.twitter-tweet p{font:20px -apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Roboto,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif}.tweet-container div:first-child{ position:absolute!Important }.tweet-container div:last-child{ position:relative!Important }

Crypto to Bounce Back Strongly from FTX Crisis

According to the blockchain analytics firm, FTX was a far lesser player in the cryptocurrency market than Mt. Gox was at the time, and the market should recover much more strongly than before.

As Jardine points out, DEXs like Uniswap and Curve controlled roughly half of all exchange inflows by late 2022. Whereas in 2014, when Mt. Gox crumbled, CEXs were the only players in the marketplace. However, as Jardine explains, FTX was steadily gaining market share while Mt. Gox was steadily losing it, and this highlights the need for analyzing market trends in business.

Despite this, Jardine determined that before its collapse eight years ago, Mt. Gox was a more important component of the crypto ecosystem than FTX was. This is because it was a keystone of the CEX category in an era when CEXes dominated.

Further, Jardine analyzes the cryptocurrency industry’s resurgence following Mt. Gox’s collapse, finding that on-chain transaction volume remained unchanged for a year or so but eventually jumped back up.

On the Flipside

  • Mt. Gox lost 850,000 BTC in a cyberattack in February 2014, prompting the exchange to halt trading, take down its website, and seek bankruptcy protection.
  • Although victims are yet to receive their money back eight years later, the Mt. Gox Trustee said on October 6 that victims had until January 10, 2023, to pick a payment mechanism for the 150,000 BTC reportedly in their possession.
  • The ultimate fate of the FTX implosion victims remains to be seen.

Why You Should Care

Despite other factors, such as Sam Bankman-Fried’s high profile, Jardine believes that the comparison should give the industry optimism. When it comes to market fundamentals, there is no reason to believe that the industry won’t recover from this, “stronger than before.”

Read more on the FTX contagion:

SBF Outlines Leverage in Letter of Apology to FTX Staff

FTX Executives, Sam Bankman-Fried, and His Parents Bought Bahamas Real Estate Worth Millions

See original on DailyCoin

Chainalysis: FTX Crisis Comparatively Smaller Than Mt. Gox’s
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Sara summer
Sara summer Nov 24, 2022 6:23PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Sᴜᴄᴄᴇss ᴅᴏᴇsɴ'ᴛ ᴊᴜsᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴄᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴀ ᴍᴀɴ's ᴅᴏᴏʀ, ɪᴛ ʀᴇϙᴜɪʀᴇs ʜᴀʀᴅ ᴡᴏʀᴋ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴏɴsɪsᴛᴇɴᴄʏ. Aʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜʀᴇᴇ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜs ᴀɢᴏ ᴍʏ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴀɴʏ ғᴀᴄᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴠᴇʀʏ sᴇʀɪᴏᴜs sᴇᴛ ʙᴀᴄᴋ, ᴏɴ ᴅɪsᴄᴜssɪɴɢ ɪᴛ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴀ ғʀɪᴇɴᴅ ʜᴇ ᴛʜᴇɴ sᴘᴏᴋᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴜs ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ɪɴᴛʀᴏᴅᴜᴄᴇᴅ ᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴍᴀʀᴋᴇᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ sᴀᴍᴇ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ɢᴀᴠᴇ ᴜs ᴀɴ ᴀᴜᴛʜᴇɴᴛɪᴄ Exᴘᴇʀᴛ ᴛʀᴀᴅᴇʀ ᴡʜᴏ ʜᴇʟᴘ I ᴀɴᴅ ᴍʏ ᴄᴏʟʟᴇᴀɢᴜᴇs ɢᴇᴛ ʙᴀᴄᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴏᴜʀ ғɪᴛs I ᴍᴇᴀɴ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ( $ 780ᴋ )Wᴇ ᴍᴀᴅᴇ ɪɴ ᴊᴜsᴛ 14ᴡᴇᴇᴋs ᴡᴇ ᴅɪᴅ ɪɴᴠᴇsᴛᴇᴅ $ 270ᴋ ... Amelia lee Richter ᴏɴ 📲 🅸🅽🆂🆃🅰🅶🆁🅰🅼 sʜᴇ ɪs ɪɴᴅᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ɢᴇɴɪᴜs ᴏɴᴇ, ɴᴏᴡ I sᴇᴇ ʀᴇᴀsᴏɴs ᴡʜʏ ᴀ ʟᴏᴛ ᴏғ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ sᴀʏ ɢᴏᴏᴅ ᴛʜɪɴɢs ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ʜᴇʀ, ᴀ ᴠᴇʀʏ ʀᴇʟᴇɴᴛʟᴇss ᴛʀᴀᴅᴇʀ ᴡɪᴛʜ ɢᴏᴏᴅ ʀᴇsᴜʟᴛs.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email