Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Judge dismisses suit against New York Fed over COVID-19 firings

Published 09/25/2023, 01:34 PM
Updated 09/25/2023, 03:46 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: People walk by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in the financial district of New York City, U.S., June 14, 2023.  REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton//File Photo

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit accusing the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of illegally firing two longtime employees who claimed religious objections in refusing to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman in Manhattan ruled against Lori Gardner-Alfred and Jeanette Diaz, who spent a respective 35 years and 27 years at the New York Fed and had been senior executive specialists before their March 2022 dismissals.

The New York Fed began requiring COVID-19 vaccines for all employees in August 2021.

Gardner-Alfred, of the Bronx, New York, claimed she was a member of the Temple of Healing Spirit, which opposed the "invasive techniques."

Diaz, of Bayonne, New Jersey, said she believed the vaccines were made with aborted fetal cells, and that being vaccinated was inconsistent with the teachings of the Catholic Church.

But in a 52-page decision, Liman said the plaintiffs did not prove they had sincere religious objections to being vaccinated, and instead offered only their "say-so" on the issue.

Liman found no evidence Gardner-Alfred belonged to the Temple of Healing Spirit, followed its alleged practices, or opposed vaccines before the New York Fed dispute.

The judge said Diaz's belief about aborted fetal cells also appeared to have been new, and that she may have also had secular objections to vaccinations.

He cited Diaz's subscriptions to eight newsletters from anti-vaccination sources, and a December 2021 email to Gardner-Alfred where she anagrammed the letters in COVID-19 variants "Delta" and "Omicron" to spell "Media Control."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Liman said it would be an "extreme proposition" to grant an accommodation "whenever someone with a political objection to a rule wraps that objection in religious garb."

John Balestriere, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in an email: "We respectfully disagree with Judge Liman's conclusions. We are discussing with our clients what their options are."

The New York Fed declined to comment.

The case is Gardner-Alfred et al v Federal Reserve Bank of New York, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-01585.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.