Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Last Call for Cyber Monday! Save Now on Claim 60% OFF

Oil Down 16% in May, Most in 6 Months as Trade Wars Hit Hard

Published May 31, 2019 12:34PM ET Updated May 31, 2019 03:55PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters.
 
NXGN
0.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
LCO
+1.35%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
CL
+1.34%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Barani Krishnan

Investing.com - It's macro in, micro out, as oil markets head for their worst monthly loss in six months amid trade wars that force investors to focus on a potential recession rather than the specifics of energy supply and demand.

West Texas Intermediate, the benchmark for U.S. crude, and U.K. Brent, the global gauge for oil, posted double-digit losses for May after Mexico became President Donald Trump's latest target for tariffs for allegedly not doing enough to prevent illegal migration into the U.S.

WTI settled Friday's trade down $3.09, or 5.5%, at $53.50 per barrel.


Brent lost $2.40, or 3.6%, for the session to settle at $64.47. The August Brent contract finished at $61.99, down 5.1%.

For the month, U.S. crude fell 16% while its U.K. peer lost 11%. Both benchmarks are still 18% and 20% higher, respectively, on the year.

But most importantly, in Friday's trade WTI broke below the $55 per barrel level the first time since February, setting a 13-week low of $54.73. Brent had crashed under $65 for a 16-week low of $63.05.

On a more crucial technical level, both benchmarks broke below all key moving-day averages in the past week, including the lowest 5-day moving average. By dollar value alone, oil has lost about $11 on a barrel from a $22 gain accumulated since the Christmas Eve lows of last year, its bottom during the 2018 selloff. That's a loss of exactly 50%, coming despite continued production cuts by OPEC.

OPEC-led production cuts, U.S. sanctions on Iran and Venezuela, along with disruptions in Nigeria or Russia all contributed to a 40% rally in the first four months of the year. But since May began, oil prices turned direction amid trade wars waged by the Trump administration.

On Thursday, the administration imposed a 5% tariff on all imported goods from Mexico beginning June 10 and said it has plans to “gradually increase” that tax to 25% until the flow of undocumented immigrants across the border stops. Trump later tweeted that stopping the flow of illegal drugs may also be a condition, while having companies move production to the U.S. to avoid tariffs was also part of the surprise plan.

The tax on Mexican imports could disrupt a long-standing cross-border energy trade, hitting U.S. refiners that use Mexican oil by boosting prices and raising concerns about potential retaliation by the world's biggest buyer of U.S. energy products, Reuters reported.

Mexico sends 600,000 to 700,000 barrels of oil to the United States every day, mostly to refiners that process that crude into gasoline, diesel and other products. Mexico buys more than 1 million bpd of U.S. crude and fuel, more than any other country, and analysts are concerned that retaliatory tariffs from Mexico could disrupt that trade.

The biggest trade war waged by the U.S. is, of course, with China with the more-than year-long showdown already threatening to push the world into a recession as neither side has shown signs of blinking. Besides the showdowns with China and Mexico, the Trump administration has also removed India – another giant economy with more than 1 billion consumers – from the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences, which gives favorable access to goods from developing countries.

“'Screwed by Macro' may deserve a place on my headstone as prices are cratering due to 'trade fears'," ICAP (LON:NXGN) energy futures broker Scott Shelton lamented in a note on Friday after he called on investors just a day earlier to go long on oil in anticipation of strong crude draw numbers in the U.S. Energy Information Administration's weekly report released Thursday.

The EIA said in its regular weekly report that crude oil inventories decreased by just 0.28 million barrels in the week to May 24, compared to a forecast draw of 0.86 million barrels. In two previous weeks, it announced back-to-back builds of around 5 million barrels.

Oil bulls typically count on strong refinery runs and heavy gasoline consumption in the run-up to the summer. But refiners have been slow to draw down crude as profit margins for producing gasoline were running about 30% below year-ago levels.

Some suspect that one reason for Trump's escalation of trade battles around the world was to rein in high oil prices after OPEC's refusal to raise production lately.

"Most interestingly, he hasn’t sent out a single tweet about oil for weeks now while carrying out all these, so you can’t even accuse him of intentionally suppressing the market," John Kilduff, founding partner at New York energy hedge fund Again Capital, said. "Oil bulls have no choice but to grit their teeth and see how far he goes.”

Oil Down 16% in May, Most in 6 Months as Trade Wars Hit Hard
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Ernie Koehn
Ernie Koehn May 31, 2019 1:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I am a Trump supporter, but if he wants the US to be energy independent, he should be finding a happy medium to support both fuel costs and oil profits...when American oil companies see oil prices drop 14% with no end in sight, they will cut exploration and capital spending, this will cut jobs and construction in of the largest expanding industries, it will be cutting a lot of high paying jobs for Voters.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan May 31, 2019 1:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
True, Ernie. This is an argument I've heard from both the drilling and managed futures sides of the game. Trump is quite myopic in focusing on just the average Joe who wants gas under $3. He seems to have conveniently forgotten that the broader energy industry voted for him too.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan May 31, 2019 1:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I hear you: It's hard to ask the industry members to stand up and be counted when you're busting their knees at the same time.
Hank Williams
Hank Williams May 31, 2019 1:09PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Do you think KT knows the US has an oil industry with voters.
Barani Krishnan
Barani Krishnan May 31, 2019 1:09PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Copying my response from another thread, Hank, and presume that you're asking about Trump:. . "Probably, but he's more concerned about the impact of gas prices on the average voter. That could make much of a difference in voting as history has shown. Very pricey gas = very moody voters."
Hank Williams
Hank Williams May 31, 2019 1:09PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Yeah but haven't we all become accustomed to two to three dollar gas at the pump. Maybe he is using lower gasoline prices to offset the fact that he can't get interest rates down. But if he keeps going interest rates will go negative. Ha ha ha.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email