Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Was The Dfinity Team Responsible For ICP’s 95% Crash?

By Crypto BriefingCryptocurrencyJun 30, 2021 06:49AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/was-the-dfinity-team-responsible-for-icps-95-crash-200589045
Was The Dfinity Team Responsible For ICP’s 95% Crash?
By Crypto Briefing   |  Jun 30, 2021 06:49AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

A look into one of the fastest crashes in crypto history.

Key Takeaways

  • Dfinity's native token ICP dropped 95% from its highs in the space of a few weeks.
  • Independent research from Arkham reveals that the Dfinity Foundation may have dumped tokens on retail while blocking early investors from selling.
  • The founders have denied the allegations and blamed market euphoria and a general correction in crypto markets for the price action.

Since its launch, a 95% crash in ICP’s token price has raised suspicions that Dfinity Foundation carried out crypto’s biggest ever rug pull. Although the team has denied all allegations, it has lost its luster as one of the most promising decentralized ecosystems.

Loopholes In Dfinity Foundation’s Plans

After Dfinity’s ICP token tanked 95%, some signs suggest that the team carried out a rug pull.

Over the course of 50 days, ICP’s price dropped from $630 to a low of $28.30 last Friday.

Dfinity’s token launched on May 7 and saw subsequent listings on leading exchanges like Binance and Coinbase Global (NASDAQ:COIN), helping it to surge to $630 within days. However, the drop came just as quickly, with the token recording negative gains almost every day since.

Like many previous token dumps, Dfinity’s token distribution process had raised several worrying signals that dented investor confidence. Arkham recently published a report on the Internet Computer token, tracing the flow of tokens from the foundation to exchanges without any public correspondence of ICP distribution from the team. The report noted:

“Our analysis has led us to believe that possible insiders connected to Dfinity have been dumping billions of dollars of ICP on exchanges at the expense of small early supporters and retail investors.”

What stood out from the beginning in Dfinity’s complex design and tokenomics was the different vesting periods for early investors and the developing team.

The early seed investment round in 2017 was open to the public for $0.03 per ICP; the team had raised $3.9 million from 370 investors. These investors were allotted a quarter of the supply. However, that came with a 12-month vesting period after distribution in May.

Tweet
Tweet

Many of the project’s investors began cashing in gains of between 100x and 10,000x from investments they had made before 2018.

Moreover, up to 50% of the supply allocated to the Dfinity Foundation, its advisors, team members, and the Internet Computer Association was not subject to a similar vesting schedule.

According to research from Arkham, Dfnitiy—which holds 25% supply—transferred 18 million ICP tokens worth $3.6 billion to exchanges from its treasury in May and June. These transactions involve direct transfers to exchanges worth $2 billion and the rest was via alleged insider trading.

Dominic Williams, the founder of Dfinity, confirmed in a tweet that the Dfinity Foundation’s tokens were not vested and were instead earmarked to lock for staking on the network. Williams has also denied allegations that the founders dumped tokens and carried out the activity.

Tweet
Tweet

Nevertheless, the price action raises significant suspicions around a dominant force benefitting from the selloff, particularly after the token reached a top three position in cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.

The crypto community had high hopes for Dfinity’s “Internet Computer” vision, which promised a full-stacked decentralized ecosystem with an all-star developer team. Naturally, many market participants had invested and were eager to get on the ICP bandwagon.

Whether retail or a large whale was responsible for the dump, the coveted team has lost much of its credibility in the last few months. ICP is up 85% from lows of $28.30, last trading at $50.

Original Post

Was The Dfinity Team Responsible For ICP’s 95% Crash?
 

Related Articles

Was The Dfinity Team Responsible For ICP’s 95% Crash?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email