Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

The Energy Report: Back-Track

Published 02/20/2024, 03:50 PM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

It seems that the oil trade is backtracking on calls for ‘peak oil demand’ and is now more focused on the possibility of ‘peak oil’ production in the US and around the globe. Oil demand is on track to hit another record high. The failure of alternative energies to fill the void is raising concerns about the ability of the world to meet demand in the next few years. This comes as plunging natural gas prices may force a lot of US drillers out of business and some predictions that the shale miracle in the United States has seen its best days. I don’t believe that the shale revolution is behind us. I do believe that because of the push from the Biden administration away from US fossil fuel production, it will have long-term consequences for the US economy and the stability of the globe.

The Wall Street Journal reports that US crude oil output is expected to increase by just 170,000 barrels a day in 2024 from last year, that’s down from a jump of 1 million barrels a day in 2023, according to federal record-keepers. That is the smallest annual increase since 2016, not counting the pandemic. The Journal says that, “gushers of new U.S. crude have helped cap soaring oil prices despite OPEC production cuts and global turmoil, including most recently in the Middle East. The gains were driven by private producers that commandeered rigs after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine sent prices soaring to more than $120 a barrel in early 2022. Now, that growth is expected to slow dramatically. Declining oil prices led producers to lay down rigs last year. Then, many of the operators that had been drilling with abandon were acquired by bigger players looking for ways to expand in the U.S. Those big public companies have given priority to returning cash to shareholders over drilling new wells according to the Journal.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Oil prices are backtracking even after the Biden administration backtracked on their electric car push which is proving to be a disaster on so many levels. I am sure it will only be a matter of time before they blame President Trump for the lack of electric car sales that the Biden administration tried to force them to buy. The 2023 mandate by Biden to automakers required them to make sure that every 7 out of 10 cars that they sell is electric…whether we want them or not. The problem is they can’t force Americans to buy a product that they do not want, not only because it’s more expensive but also is not as reliable.

Reuter News reports that:

“Joe Biden’s administration is set to ease proposed yearly requirements through 2030 of its sweeping plan to aggressively cut tailpipe emissions and ramp up electric vehicle sales, two sources told Reuters on Sunday. Automakers and the United Auto Workers had urged the Biden administration to slow the proposed ramp-up in EV sales. They say EV technology is still too costly for many mainstream U.S. consumers and that more time is needed to develop the charging infrastructure.”

Of course, the electric car transition was never based on science as it takes much more greenhouse gas emissions to build an electric car and the EV is only as clean as the power it uses to charge its batteries.

The Wall Street Journal reported in some parts of the world, such as China, the electricity used to charge the batteries of the country’s growing number of EVs comes largely from CO2-heavy coal, diminishing an EV’s impact on combating climate change. In 2022, China’s electric power production, which runs largely on coal and oil, pumped 530 grams of CO2/KWH into the atmosphere.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Now The New York Times is reporting that:

“In a concession to automakers and labor unions, the Biden administration intends to relax elements of one of its most ambitious strategies to combat climate change, limits on tailpipe emissions that are designed to get Americans to switch from gas-powered cars to electric vehicles, according to three people familiar with the plan.”

Geopolitical risk factors for oil are providing support. Bloomberg reported that:

“The crew of a commercial ship in the Red Sea abandoned the vessel following a Houthi attack — the first such evacuation since the militant group began menacing trade in the vital waterway late last year. Two ship ballistic missiles damaged the Belize-flagged Rubymar on Sunday evening local time, US Central Command said Monday on social media platform X.”

The Houthi rebels, that have caused so much concern about the safe passage through the Red Sea, have been bought and paid for with Iranian oil money. That money also funds and supports Hamas and Hezbollah.

Even the New York Times acknowledges that the Biden administration has been a total failure when it has come to enforcing sanctions on Iran. The New York Times reports that there is a $2.8 billion hole in U.S. Sanctions on Iran a Times investigation reveals how lax government oversight allowed shadowy oil tankers, covered by American insurance, to fund Iran’s regime. The Times writes that: “Treasury Secretary Yellen told Congress that her teams were “doing everything that they possibly can to crack down” on illegal shipments, and a senior White House adviser said that “extreme sanctions” had effectively stalled Iran’s energy sector. But the sanctions failed to stop oil worth billions of dollars from leaving Iran over the past year, a New York Times investigation has found, revealing a significant gap in U.S. oversight. The oil was transported aboard 27 tankers, using liability insurance obtained from an American company. That meant that the U.S. authorities could have disrupted the oil’s transport by advising the insurer, the New York-based American Club, to revoke the coverage, which is often required for tankers to do business.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Instead, the 27 tankers were able to transport shipments across at least 59 trips since 2023, the Times found, with half the vessels carrying oil on multiple journeys. The Treasury Department did not respond to a question about whether it was aware the ships had transported Iranian oil while insured by the American Club. The tankers exhibited warning signs that industry experts, and the Treasury, have said collectively warrant greater scrutiny.”

That is not a surprise to readers of the Energy Report as we have mentioned the fact that these sanctions have not been enforced. Anybody who’s been following this situation realizes that the Biden administration’s decision to try to allow Iran to export oil in return for some Iranian nuclear deal in better relations, was a major miscalculation based upon what’s been happening with Iranian oil money and its support for these terror groups around the globe.

Oh, by the way, the Houthi rebels are once again considered a terror group by the Biden administration. You remember they took them off of the terror list that President Trump put them on.

Also, the so-called sanctions on Russia, the toughest ever according to Biden, are not working either. Even CNN reports that, “Russia is entering its third year of war in Ukraine with an unprecedented amount of cash in government coffers, bolstered by a record $37 billion of crude oil sales to India last year, according to new analysis, which concludes that some of the crude was refined by India and then exported to the United States as oil products worth more than $1 billion." CNN says, “This flow of payments, ultimately to Moscow’s benefit, comes from India increasing its purchases of Russian crude by over 13 times its pre-war amounts, according to the analysis by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), exclusively shared with CNN."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

More climate policy calamities. The FT reports that, “ExxonMobil has warned it is willing to withhold billions of dollars in climate-related investments in Europe unless Brussels cuts environmental red tape which the company blames for the “deindustrialization of the European economy”.

Oil prices continue to be solid but pulled back in a light volume Presidents Day trade. Oil demand concerns continue to be the mantra of the bears while with tightening global market is the base case for the bulls.

The bears are having a much harder time ignoring the tightening global oil supplies that we’ve been talking about was going to happen for many months more of the big banks are turning very bullish on oil despite today’s action.

We still see significant risk to the upside. OPEC is going to make sure that they regain control of prices and Russia can afford to help with their sanction money windfall. Tass Reports that, “Russia intends to fully meet its OPEC+ quota in February despite a decrease in refining, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said. “We will fulfill our obligations,” he told reporters when asked whether Russia will boost the export of oil in February to offset a decline in refining. Russia’s OPEC+ obligations imply a reduction of both supplies of oil and petroleum products.

The natural gas crash on the other hand is creating major issues and could put many producers out of business. When the second polar vortex did not materialize, we flipped to an extremely warm pattern that just crushed demand for natural gas. The production continues to be high because of associated gas. Prices hit an inflation-adjusted 30-year low when front-month futures touch $1.58/MMBtu. That allowed gas inventories to hit a six-year high. This will force cutbacks in drilling. Since January 13, the price of gas has fallen by more than 40% to $1.6 for an MMBTU. Probably a time to buy some puts and calls.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

"Those big public companies have given priority to returning cash to shareholders over drilling new wells according to the Journal." So apparently it isn't the Biden administration clamping down on oil companies to suppress output. Listen to Phil and his Fox News echo chamber, and you'd think it's all Biden's fault.
Same fake strong demand claim, different day lies from Phil.  Toyota has a battery that will go 750 miles.  Demand peaked in 2019. In 2004 Phil was on the peak oil bandwagon, guess what? Never happened like his other bombastic predictions.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.