🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

Terra At The Crossroads: Major Validators Support Fork But Community Is Resistant

Published 05/18/2022, 01:41 AM
LUNAt/USD
-
USTC/USD
-

More than a dozen validators have announced support for a Terra chain without its stablecoin.

Key Takeaways

  • Over a dozen validators say they will support a fork of Terra that focuses on development rather than its stablecoin.
  • That fork was proposed Monday by Terraform Labs CEO Do Kwon; voting on the proposal will take place Wednesday.
  • The community is divided on whether to fork the chain or carry out a burn plan, though the plans are not exclusive.

Several Terra validators have signaled their support of Do Kwon’s plan to launch a new blockchain that would eschew the UST stablecoin. Much of the community, however, has expressed hesitation.

New Terra Chain Gains Support

Do Kwon’s most recent proposal for saving the Terra network has attracted powerful supporters while drawing a great deal of community criticism.

The Terraform Labs CEO announced on Monday that Terra could split into two chains: Terra and Terra Classic. The new, non-classic chain would abandon the failing UST stablecoin, now valued at just $0.08. Instead, it would focus on promoting and incentivizing new development.

Kwon posted a call to action as part of Monday's announcement: “We encourage Terra developers to signal support [and] commit to build on the fork on public channels,” he wrote.

Now, several validators have announced their willingness to support the new chain. Supporters include the staking providers BTC.Secure, StaderLabs and 01labs, the mixing service TerraBay, the DeFi service Nebula Protocol, and the NFT marketplace RandomEarth.

Other supporters include groups such as Stake Systems, Delight, Chainlayer, Terran.One, THORchain.BULL, Setten, Mr. K, Smart Stake, Angel Protocol, Aperture Finance, and SCV Finance.

Valkyrie Protocol (not to be confused with the ETF and digital asset management firm Valkyrie) has also expressed support.

Sigma Finance ambiguously phrased its support for the new chain, writing that “the sigma grindset continues on Terra v2.”

Collectively, these validators control at least 18.9% of the network’s voting power. Five of them—Stake Systems, Smart Stake, 01node, Delight, and Terran.One—are among the top ten validators, and together they control 15.4% of the voting power.

Proposal Outcome Is Still Unclear

A vote on the chain-split proposal will not be carried out until Wednesday, meaning it is currently impossible to see how much support the new chain has in a practical sense.

Despite the apparent support for a new chain among validators, the broader Terra community—or at least its most vocal members—seems to oppose the idea of a chain split.

Those users generally support an earlier proposal that would involve burning tokens. That proposal has gained 93.5% support.

However, the two plans are not mutually exclusive. Some validators, such as Smart Stake and SCV, favor both plans.

Original Post

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.