
Please try another search
On Oct. 24, the Hang Seng lost 6.4 percentage points, falling to 15180 HKD.
These are the same values since 2009.
The reasons for the collapse of the index are different.
Election of Xi Jinping as President of the People's Republic of China, secretary general, and Chief of the armed forces; he will continue with his zero covid policy. These political moves hurt the economy.
GDP grew less than expected. Furthermore, his policy will likely continue to crack down on large Chinese companies. Some of the biggest companies' stocks fell on Oct. 24. Tencent lost 11.43%.
And Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) lost 11.42% as well.
It is necessary to introduce two risk indices using three ETFs: Invesco China Technology ETF (NYSE:CQQQ), Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF (NYSE:CHIU) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF (NYSE:CHIQ).
The risk indices are CQQQ/CHIU and CHIQ/CHIU. Why?
There is a positive correlation between Hang Seng and the risk indices.
When Hang Seng rises, the Chinese technology sector outperforms the utilities sector.
Instead, Hang Seng loses when the utilities sector outperforms the tech sector. Same situation if we use the other risk index:
When Hang Seng rises, the consumer discretionary Chinese sector outperforms the utilities sector; when the utilities sector outperforms the consumer discretionary sector, Hang Seng loses.
Why does this happen?
A stock index is pushed higher by volatile companies such as those in the tech and consumer discretionary sectors; instead, when a stock index falls, the utilities sector outperforms the other sectors, in fact:
CHIU is a defensive sector. CQQQ and CHIQ are aggressive sectors.
Investors buy aggressive sectors when they are positive and defensive sectors when they don't want to risk. So what can we say? CQQQ / CHIU and CHIQ / CHIU are two excellent risk on / risk off indices.
Tencent belongs to the tech sector and Alibaba to the discretionary goods sector. What correlation do companies have with risk indices? Positive:
The two big companies have been lost recently because the climate is risk-off. They will bounce back when the risk indices reverse their trends.
The most recent NFIB (National Federation Of Independent Business) survey is sending a strong signal of an economic recession. In 2019, the NFIB survey, combined with an inverted...
As the Federal Reserve winds down its rate hiking campaign, precious metals bulls are anticipating a favorable environment for gains ahead. On Wednesday, Fed policymakers raised...
Stock markets have been under a little pressure on Friday, and the US is poised to open in the red also, with the Nasdaq 100 hit particularly hard. This comes on the back of some...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.