Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Privacy Coin Zcash Weighing Proof-Of-Stake Move

By Crypto BriefingCryptocurrencyAug 04, 2021 12:51AM ET
Privacy Coin Zcash Weighing Proof-Of-Stake Move
By Crypto Briefing   |  Aug 04, 2021 12:51AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

It looks like Zcash could be planning to move to a Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism in place of its current Proof-of-Work algorithm.

Key Takeaways

  • Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox wants to move Zcash to Proof-of-Stake.
  • The primary concern isn’t the environment, but greater security at a lower cost.
  • Wilcox believes the value proposition of privacy coins has never been greater than now.

Zcash is considering moving away from the energy-intensive Proof-of-Work consensus algorithm to the lighter, faster, and more eco-friendly Proof-of-Stake, Zooko Wilcox told Forbes.

Zcash Founder Says Proof-of-Stake is Proven

Zcash may be ditching Proof-of-Work in favor of Proof-of-Stake.

The plan to change the privacy coin’s consensus algorithm comes more than two years after user rebekah93 first proposed the move in a Zcash Improvement Proposal (ZIP) to the community.

Proof-of-Stake is a mechanism used to secure blockchains. Unlike Proof-of-Work blockchains like Bitcoin, which rely on an energy-intensive mining process, Proof-of-Stake allows users to secure the network by staking crypto tokens rather than providing computational power. In Proof-of-Stake blockchains, validators are randomly selected to add new blocks to the chain instead of having miners compete to find the block’s hash fastest. Ethereum is planning a merge to Proof-of-Stake as part of its Ethereum 2.0 upgrade, and most newer blockchains that have launched in recent years use Proof-of-Stake over Proof-of-Work.

According to founder Zooko Wilcox, Zcash is starting to think about the potential transaction. He told Forbes that the consensus algorithm is now “proven” and has already been successfully implemented in a number of cryptocurrencies, including Cardano, Cosmos, Algorand, and Tezos.

While Wilcox acknowledged the environmental concerns surrounding Proof-of-Work, his primary motivations for the shift have more to do with the greater—to his belief—security and performance benefits Proof-of-Stake offers. He said:

“I think Proof-of-Work has some security flaws, as has been demonstrated by the 51% attacks that have occurred (when a miner controls a majority of computing power on the network and can steal tokens). And I think Proof-of-Stake can provide a much more powerful kind of security and at a lower cost.”

His views on the security proposition of the Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism are in line with Ethereum’s founder Vitalik Buterin. Both argue that 51% attacks are much easier to recover from in Proof-of-Stake protocols because bad actors can quickly be identified, and the community can coordinate to slash the attacker’s funds in a “minority user-activated soft fork.” The same process requires a hard fork and is significantly harder to execute in Proof-of-Work-based systems.

Since the Forbes interview, Wilcox has published a blog post via Electric Coin Company, the company that launched Zcash, titled “Should Zcash switch from Proof-of-Work to Proof of Stake?” In it, Wilcox presents several arguments of the supposed merits of the move, including improvements in security, energy efficiency, and decentralization.

Original Post

Privacy Coin Zcash Weighing Proof-Of-Stake Move

Related Articles

Privacy Coin Zcash Weighing Proof-Of-Stake Move

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email