Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

A Stock That Has Fallen Sharply Is Not The Same As A Cheap Stock

Published 01/21/2022, 05:39 AM
Updated 09/20/2023, 06:34 AM

This article was written exclusively for Investing.com

Interest rates have soared, and stock markets have been melting as a result. Rates are likely going to continue to rise, especially on the short end of the yield curve, and that is only going to pressure expensive stocks lower over time as valuations reset. 

This reset is leading to multiple contraction across sectors and individual stock names.

While it may seem like some stocks are relative bargains at current levels, some may very well still have a long way to fall before they return to pre-pandemic valuations, especially if the Fed is as serious about tightening monetary policy as it seems to be. 

Technology Sector

For example, the S&P Information Technology Index has seen its PE ratio expand from 23.1 in February 2020 to its current 25.5. So, while the index is down about 10% from Dec. 27, 2021, it doesn't mean it's cheap. The index would still need to fall an additional 9.5% to see it get back to pre-pandemic valuations. The big question ultimately is if the pre-pandemic peak PE ratio is too high. 

Prior to the run higher from October 2019 to February 2020, the tech index never even trade with a PE higher than 20.

Even stocks like NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), which has already seen its price fall by more than 20%, could have much to fall further as rates rise and multiples recalibrate. Keep in mind that this stock was trading just below $80 in February 2020 and now trades around $250.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Undoubtedly, the company has seen strong earnings growth over the past 2-years due to its leadership in GPUs and the need for them in data centers. However, it also saw multiple expansion, with its PE rising to a peak 67 times its NTM earnings estimates. Now the PE has fallen back to 48.9, but still in February 2020 the stocks PE was 37.7. At that PE ratio, the stock today would be worth $196.

One could argue where the correct multiple should be and how much of the growth the company has seen over the last two years that is real and has not been pulled forward. But one would think if part of the reason for the stock's huge advance is due to the low-rate environment, then if rates were to rise, it would seem appropriate that the valuation should reset lower as well. 

NVIDIA PE

Zoom 

Even stocks like Zoom Video (NASDAQ:ZM), which has seen massive growth over the past two years and a stock price that is down more than 70%, aren't cheap when considering how much growth has been pulled forward and given future growth forecast.

Currently, analysts forecast earnings to fall by 10.2% in fiscal 2023 to $4.37 per share and then grow by just 8.3% in 2024. The company is now finishing the fiscal year 2022 and is forecast to earn $4.87 per share. Zoom is expected to have no earnings growth over the next two years and is trading with a PE of 36.7 times its NTM earnings estimates—for no growth. That doesn't sound like a bargain.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

ZOOM PE

So, while many stocks are down big on the surface, it is not the same as saying they are cheap or a bargain. If it turns out that future earnings growth was pulled forward, and future growth rates have been sacrificed, then these stocks may have much further to fall, especially as rates rise. 

Latest comments

shorts spreading FUD on every imaginable media outlet for weeks...
where can i see pe ratio graph for stocks?
1) Rates and Feds this week announcements will show market’s trend for February and March 2) Russia-Ukraine development
Rates have nothing to do with NVDA or any other stocks. Just pump and dumps. Nobody is buying stocks based on valuations or FED rates, otherwise INTC and VZ would be best performing based on picture perfect multiples. Nothing go up without pullbacks.
fiscal/monetary conditions have nothing to do with stocks?
Dude All stocks are red for a week
Michael how about buying $sqqq ?
Just gonna wait for Wednesday’s show
Thursday 27 to be exact
I dollar cost averaged on every -4% dip into qqqm and not qqq as for me qqqm is the same but with lower expense ratio
Great analysis, Michael. I agree that most of the high P/E ratios we have been seeing lately were due to plenty of money floating around since the pandemic started in March 2020. Investors were assuming the interest rates to stay at the historical lows that we had gotten used to. But this has changed and we should see the stock prices go down, and return to the P/E multiples of pre-pandemic levels.
Precious information
ZM and NVDA!? Lol
down 2022
Good Article
I don't think is correct comparing Zoom and Nvidia, apple with bananas.. Zoom would be worth much more in a pandemic scenario because all the growth is about people staying home, Nvidia is going his road to the metaverse pandemic or no..
Absolutely
But not all people stays at home...
always appreciate your knowledge and insight Michael, thanks!
I read everyone one of your and Lance's articles! I learn alot, big fan!
Absolutely agree
Interesting I remember you saying almost 2 months ago that the market was predicted to go down. Thank you for the futuristic information that helped me prepare.
Except this guy was also saying the same thing for a year while markets skyrocketed.  Had you listened to him early 2021 you'd have missed any and all gains, since there's not a single stock, etf, etc that this guy is actually bullish on.  Any doomsday prophet will eventually be right if he says it long enough.  We all knew a correction would come sooner or later, but you can't just sit on the sidelines or you miss the gains too.  Even if something like VOO declines another 10%, you'd still be up for the year.  Or,  taking this guy's advice, be losing 7% to inflation under your matress.
Your opinions are very interesting even thought I have only recently learned about Michael, and I have only been reading his article the last 3 months. Thanks for the input. I’ll keep my eyeballs open.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.