Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

A European Camel Is A Horse Made In Committee

Published 06/27/2013, 11:00 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

European agreements seem to always compromise formations. The agreement struck several hours ago on the handling of failing banks is no exception to that generalization.

The Demands
On one side, the Germans, the Netherlands and Finland wanted clear uniform rules that would allow investors and creditors to understand a transparent process. On the other side were countries that wanted to preserve greater national discretion. This camp included France and a couple of non-EMU members, such as the UK and Sweden.

First, there was an agreement that creditors in order of seniority would have to cover the first 8% of the distressed institution's liabilities. Then national authorities can greater exemptions, regulatory forbearance and turn to national backstops. There was also some room for greater national discretion, requiring it appears simply EU notification.

The first part of the national backstops are the resolution funds that are financed by a tax on banks. The agreement calls for their national resolution funds to be the equivalent of 1.3% of the country's insured deposits and the European Commission must approve their use. The agreement also limits the role of these resolution funds to 5% of the troubled bank unless unsecured senior bond holders are wiped out.

First Shareholders, Then Taxpayers
European officials also agreed in principle that shareholders, bond holders and large depositors (in excess of 100k euros) should bear costs before taxpayers. The idea that uninsured depositors are on the hook was controversial, but after the Cyprus fiasco earlier this year, the die appeared cast. The idea that uninsured depositors should be treated as insured made little economic sense. In the US, the resolution of a troubled bank does not often require hitting uninsured depositors, but it has. In the Indy Mac case, for example, uninsured depositors lost about 50%. This did not trigger a wide run by depositors at other banks.

In Cyprus, where banks depended almost exclusive on deposits for funding, insured depositors were ultimately protected (albeit with capital controls), but large depositors were not. It is this part of the Cyprus program that is now generalizable.

Recall that the European Union has already committed a third of its annual GDP to aid banks between 2008 and 2011. European officials want to break the link between banks and the sovereigns. The banking union is seen as a necessary step in this direction. There is a role for the ESM to aid banks. However, and this is important, the agreement struck does not come into effect until 2018.

What's Next?
In some ways, the agreement, as arduous as it may have been to achieve, may prove easier than the next steps. It is not yet clear whether national leaders or a central European authority will have the final say on closing or restructuring a troubled financial institution. National officials in Europe, unlike the US, are loath to shutter banks. The US had a market centric model of capital distribution. Europe remains more bank centric. Several EU countries are reluctant to support a central resolution authority.

Tough Sell
And therein lies the key tension and why compromise will remain the order of the day: integration means the surrender of sovereignty. Understandably, national officials are reluctant to give up sovereignty unless there is no alternative. Yet, if the EMU is to be sustained, greater integration is necessary. What is ultimately being negotiated is how much sovereignty is to be surrendered and how much control will countries being able to exert over that supranational entity (Brussels).

In the US the shift from state sovereignty to a federal system may have largely taken place when the Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation. However, a true monetary union was not achieved until the Federal Reserve Act in 1914 and as the Supreme Court decision this week demonstrates, the tension between states' rights and federalism has not been fully resolved. European states, of course, enjoyed more sovereignty and for longer than US states.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.