Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

3 Dividend REITs Discounted By 12%

By Contrarian Outlook (Brett Owens)Stock MarketsNov 05, 2021 05:28AM ET
www.investing.com/analysis/3-dividend-reits-discounted-by-12-200607447
3 Dividend REITs Discounted By 12%
By Contrarian Outlook (Brett Owens)   |  Nov 05, 2021 05:28AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

Real estate investment trusts (REITs) have become quite popular with income investors in recent years. And why not? These “retirement makers” are required to give 90% of their profits to their shareholders as dividends.

So, if you’re looking to retire on dividends, REITs are a natural place to look.

Problem is, their popularity comes at a price. The Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund ETF Shares (NYSE:VNQ) yields just 2.5% today—pretty lame by its standards:

The Problem with Popularity: VNQ Pays Just 2.5%
VNQ-Price-Yield
VNQ-Price-Yield

A disappearing dividend isn’t the only problem with VNQ. Like most ETFs it tends to overweight the largest REITs, which typically translates into both lower overall yields and slower dividend growth. So, we’re left with a couple of options:

  1. We can “cherry pick” its holdings for hidden gems.
  2. Or we can buy REIT closed-end funds (CEFs) instead.

Option two is compelling today. Rather than buy an ETF at “par” or fair value, we can bank discounts up to 12% and yields as high as 7.3%.

CEFs are simply “built better” than ETFs. These superior dividend vehicles possess several advantages that give them several legs up on your average index fund. The big ones:

  • They’re actively managed. Index funds follow a specific set of rules that force them to buy certain stocks only at certain times of the year. Actively managed funds, however, can take advantage of pricing opportunities, picking up stocks at bargain valuations and dumping them when they’ve become too expensive.
  • They can “double down” on their own bets. Look at the holdings for any index ETF, and they’ll add up to 100%, as you’d imagine they should. But check out the holdings for some CEFs, and you’ll find that the math doesn’t quite work out. That’s on purpose. Closed-end funds can use debt leverage to invest even more than 100% in their high-conviction picks, which can accelerate not just price gains, but income.
  • They can put options to work. Closed-end funds can also use options, which several do to generate even more income.

These tactics can generate more income from just about any equity or fixed-income strategy. But it’s particularly powerful when combined with high-yield assets—like REITs.

So instead of generating 2% to 3% in our average REIT ETF, we can make the most of the sector with these three CEFs. They dish out dividends from 5.4% to 7.3% and trade for as cheaply as 88 cents on the dollar.

Let’s take a look, starting with the still-generous smallest yielder:

1. Cohen & Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund

Dividend Yield: 5.4%

This advanced income strategy is exactly why we look to CEFs over ETFs. The Cohen & Steers REIT & Preferred Income Fund (NYSE:RNP) is an income-oriented fund that holds REITs, as well as preferred stock, to generate a high level of yield. And currently, the 300-holding portfolio is split virtually 50/50 between the two assets.

The REIT portion of the portfolio is a roughly 30-stock who’s who of Big Real Estate that spans 11 different property types. That means decent chunks of telecommunications infrastructure play American Tower (NYSE:AMT), logistics REIT Prologis (NYSE:PLD), storage specialist Public Storage (NYSE:PSA) and a gaggle of other real estate names that you’d expect to see in any self-respecting fund.

The rest of RNP’s holdings are preferreds, and standard fare at that. While it does indeed hold a few real estate preferreds, the lion’s share are from financials such as Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) and Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC).

Given the stable, defensive nature of preferred stocks, you’d imagine that Cohen & Steers’ hybrid CEF wouldn’t have much wiggle to it compared to pure-play REIT funds.

You’d be wrong.

RNP Torches the Plain Vanilla Competition
RNP-Total-Returns
RNP-Total-Returns

RNP injects some turbo via the use of nearly 25% debt leverage so management can sink more funds into its top ideas. That helps to deliver more yield overall, plus wring more returns out of its high-performance real estate holdings.

Would-be investors might be hobbling themselves by biting at current prices, however. A 2% discount to NAV sounds good in theory, as we’re effectively buying RNP’s holdings at 98 cents on the dollar, but that’s much thinner than the average 8% discount the CEF has traded at during the past half-decade.

2. Principal Real Estate Income Fund

Dividend Yield: 6.6%

The Principal Real Estate Income Closed Fund (NYSE:PGZ) delivers another specialized strategy that you won’t find in a passive product. In this case, the fund is indeed invested almost entirely in real estate securities—but they’re not all REITs.

The lion’s share of PGZ’s assets (61%) are wrapped up in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBSes), so it’s primarily a debt fund at the moment. Another 21% of holdings are in U.S. real estate securities, but another 17% is international real estate securities, and the remainder is in short-term investments and cash.

This is a somewhat tighter portfolio of roughly 150 holdings, and unlike with RNP, no equity REITs even make the top 10. The best-held REITs—Invitation Homes (NYSE:INVH), MGM Growth Properties (NYSE:MGP) and Sun Communities (NYSE:SUI)—sit roughly between 15th and 30th at a little more than 1% of assets each.

PGZ also utilizes leverage in hopes of amplifying performance but generally hasn’t achieved the same success as RNP.

Are CMBSes Holding PGZ Back?
PGZ-Total-Returns
PGZ-Total-Returns

The performance gap since the COVID pandemic first erupted is more like a performance chasm, but it’s important to note that Principal’s CEF largely lagged the real estate index for years before that. And while the fund seemingly looks dirt-cheap as a result, at a 12% discount to NAV, that’s pretty much on par for PGZ.

Management sounds off on what has weighed on its debt portfolio thus far: “The Fed conveyed a less-dovish tone as the dot plot shifted higher and preliminary tapering discussions began to take shape. Longer-term inflation expectations cooled, and the 10-year treasury rate fell by 0.27%. Against this backdrop, the portfolio’s holdings of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities posted a quarterly return of 6.18% while global real estate securities were up 11.08%.”

3. Aberdeen Global Premier Properties Fund

Dividend Yield: 7.3%

The Aberdeen Global Premier Properties (NYSE:AWP) delivers more than 7% in annual income, making it one of the highest-yielding REIT CEFs you can buy. It trades at a modest 4% discount to NAV at the moment to boot.

And it’s the purest REIT play among the three funds here.

(Please note: Aberdeen the firm recently rebranded to Arbdn. It’s pronounced the same, but has no vowels. Yikes. Its fund names still read “Aberdeen” for now.)

Abrdn’s CEF is 100% invested in real estate securities from around the world. Like most “global” funds, the largest slug (58%) is wrapped up in U.S. securities. But that still leaves more than 40% spread across another 16 countries, with Japan (9%), Germany (5%) and the U.K. (4%) representing the top three international weights.

Even then, you have to venture outside the top 10 to find an international REIT. Top holdings are dominated by American firms, including Prologis, AvalonBay Communities (NYSE:AVB) and Welltower (NYSE:WELL).

And yet…

AWP Looks Simply Average
AWP-Total-Returns
AWP-Total-Returns

So, what’s going on here?

AWP has one major flaw that teaches us an important lesson about REIT-fund investing: International real estate has been historically weak.

This underperformance comes despite a lot of inherent advantages.

AWP doesn’t lay on the leverage too thick, but at 15%, it should still have a decent leg up on its contemporaries. And its expenses of 1.36% are more than your average Vanguard fund but mostly in line with our typical CEF. Moreover, its 7.3% yield is roughly triple the VNQ’s.

AWP’s mediocre performance largely comes down to the international holdings, which have long underperformed their U.S. counterparts, but especially so during the COVID recovery.

Double the Returns for U.S. REITs in the Past Decade
AWP-Lags-US
AWP-Lags-US

Disclosure: Brett Owens and Michael Foster are contrarian income investors who look for undervalued stocks/funds across the U.S. markets. Click here to learn how to profit from their strategies in the latest report, "7 Great Dividend Growth Stocks for a Secure Retirement."

3 Dividend REITs Discounted By 12%
 

Related Articles

Declan Fallon
Running Out Of Options By Declan Fallon - Jan 17, 2022 1

Friday was a defense by bulls day, but the frequency of the support test was a concern. The Russell 2000 (IWM) was looking the most vulnerable as it attempted a (failed) bullish...

3 Dividend REITs Discounted By 12%

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email