Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

A 10% S&P 500 Return In 2016 Shouldn’t Be A Surprise

Published 12/20/2015, 12:04 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

Per Bespoke, bullish sentiment is at a 3-year low (according to Bespoke’s sentiment work published late this week), and with the Fed rate hike, perhaps there is more pain to come to the downside, even though we are entering two of the strongest weeks of the year for the S&P 500 from a seasonal perspective.

Last year at this time, client’s were being told to expect a 0% – 5% return for the S&P 500 (here) although I thought Financials would do better in 2015 (which they haven’t) since Financials were the worst performing sector of 2015, down 7.5% as of September 30, 2015.

Here was the blog post exactly one year ago from yesterday, detailing the 2015 sector forecast using Thomson Reuters data, and here was the sector outlook for 2015 in late 2014. This sector outlook was simply Thomson’s estimates for 2015 as they stood one year ago. Note the difference in the overall S&P 500 growth (8.4% expected one year ago versus the +0.2% expected as of Friday, 12/18/15.( Also note that Energy’s expected sector earnings decline was -20% exactly one year ago, but actual today is -59% – yowser.)

In terms of “expected” S&P 500 returns why is a 10% total return (or better) expected for the S&P 500 in 2016 ?

Here is what I wrote in June 2013 citing one of Norm Conley’s charts. Norm doesn’t tweet much anymore, but his postings were a classic example of someone who “talked little, and said much”.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In June 2014, this blog cited similar work from BlackRock here.

And if those posts don’t look familiar, here is my own “long-term data” Spreadsheet that has been posted frequently, using Ibbotson return data from Morningstar’s “Stocks, Bonds, Bill & Inflation” – note the “average” return for the S&P 500 since 2000 is just over 6%, versus the long-term average return of the S&P 500 from the early 1970’s through 2014 is just shy of 12%.

I could be wrong and this doesnt constitute advice, but I do expect higher stock prices (i.e. S&P 500) in 2016 and the years ahead.

The secular bull market remains intact.

S&P 500 Earnings data – by the numbers:

  • Forward 4-quarter estimate this week is $122.99 versus last week’s $123.34
  • The P.E ratio is 16.3(x)
  • The PEG ratio remains negative.
  • The S&P 500 earnings yield is 6.13% exactly the same as last week.
  • The y/y growth rate of the forward estimate fell -0.11% versus last week’s -0.71%.

Analysis / conclusion: Last week, with the S&P 500 earnings yield back above 6%, I thought we’d see a decent rally in the S&P 500, but the S&P 500 closed the week at 2,005, versus the previous week’s 2,012 close. Once again we saw a LOT of intra-week volatility only to find that if you had slept through the week and simply looked at the change in the S&P 500 from Friday, December 11th through Friday, December 18th, you’d have though the week was a yawner. There is a positive change occurring to one of our favorite earnings metrics but I want to give it a few more weeks before putting it out for readers. Let’s see what that forward 4-quarter estimate shows next week, and the week after, the final two weeks of 2015.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The top two sector weights for clients remain Financials and Technology, and I dont expect that to change in 2016, at least as of right now. The biggest change to client portfolio’s in the last 3 – 4 months, is that some Energy exposure (Energy Select Sector SPDR (N:XLE), iShares US Energy (N:IYE)) has been added to client accounts as well as Emerging Markets (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (N:EEM), Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets (N:VWO)) and even some Brazil exposure (iShares MSCI Brazil Capped (N:EWZ)) in select accounts. These positions total roughly 5% in client accounts in terms of their weighting. Whether they get increased or reduced depends on how they trade early in 2016 and how earnings estimates shape up, not to mention how the dollar trades.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.