Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolios

Trump lawyer suggests hush money payment was extortion

Published 05/02/2024, 06:03 AM
Updated 05/02/2024, 05:26 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump attends a campaign event in Waukesha, Wisconsin, U.S. May 1, 2024.  REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo

By Jack Queen, Brendan Pierson and Andy Sullivan

NEW YORK (Reuters) -A lawyer for Donald Trump sought on Thursday to portray the hush money payment at the center of his criminal trial as extortion, questioning a lawyer involved in the deal about his cash-for-dirt negotiations with other celebrities.

Defense attorney Emil Bove's questioning of the lawyer Keith Davidson hinted at a strategy by Trump's legal team to undermine the credibility of prosecution witnesses in the first-ever criminal trial of a former U.S. president.

Trump stands accused of trying to hide a hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels shortly before the 2016 presidential election. Trump has pleaded not guilty and denies Daniels' assertion they had sex.

After Davidson testified that, as then-lawyer for Daniels, he arranged the $130,000 payment with Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen, Bove asked about Davidson's alleged efforts to seek cash from Hulk Hogan in exchange for a sex tape involving the former pro wrestler.

He also asked Davidson about attempts to trade embarrassing information for cash from celebrities including actor Charlie Sheen and reality TV star Tila Tequila.

“You were pretty well-versed in getting right up to the line without committing extortion, right?” Bove asked.

Davidson denied ever committing extortion.

Trump's lawyers are likely to take a similar tack with other expected witnesses including Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, and Cohen, who has served prison time for his role in the payment scheme.

Davidson confirmed Daniels signed a non-disclosure agreement with Trump to keep quiet about a 2006 sexual encounter, but said he would not describe the payment as hush money. "It was consideration in a civil settlement agreement," he said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Davidson said the forceful denial he helped Daniels craft when the payment was revealed in 2018 did not amount to a lie because it referred to a "romantic sexual" relationship rather than a one-off sexual encounter.

“You have to go through it word by word, and I think if you did so, it would technically be true with an extremely fine reading,” Davidson said.

Daniels later disavowed the statement and said the signature on it was not hers.

MORE FINES?

Earlier in the day, Justice Juan Merchan signaled he might fine Trump over allegations he again violated a gag order that prohibits him from making public comments about jurors, witnesses, and families of the judge and prosecutors if those statements are meant to interfere with the case.

Merchan challenged a defense assertion that Trump did not violate the gag order when he said the Manhattan jury was picked from a heavily Democratic area.

“I’m making an argument that he didn’t,” Trump lawyer Todd Blanche told the judge.

“Well I’m not agreeing with that argument,” Merchan responded without saying whether or when he would impose a fine.

Trump later claimed, inaccurately, that the gag order will prevent him from taking the witness stand to defend himself.

"I'm not allowed to testify because of an unconstitutional gag order," he told reporters in the hallway outside the courtroom. The gag order does not prevent Trump from testifying at the trial.

Prosecutors are asking Merchan to fine Trump $4,000 for violating the gag order four times last week. In one instance, the Republican Trump said in a TV interview that "that jury was picked so fast - 95% Democrats. The area's mostly all Democrat."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"By speaking about the jury at all, he places this proceeding in jeopardy," prosecutor Christopher Conroy said.

Conroy said Trump also violated the gag order by calling Cohen a liar and former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker a "nice guy." Pecker testified last week and Cohen is expected to be a crucial witness in the case.

Blanche said there was "no threat" in what Trump said about Pecker and said Cohen, in his social media comments, has been "inviting, and almost daring" Trump to respond to his comments about the trial.

Merchan declined to review a series of articles about the case that Trump wanted to post online. "When in doubt, steer clear," the judge said, prompting Trump to shake his head and sigh.

Any penalty would follow a $9,000 fine Merchan imposed on Tuesday. Merchan said at that session that he might jail Trump if he continues to defy the gag order. Conroy said prosecutors were not yet asking for Trump to be jailed.

Trump claims prosecutors are working with Democratic President Joe Biden to undercut his bid to win back the White House and says Merchan faces a conflict of interest because his daughter has done work for Democratic politicians.

Trump faces three other criminal prosecutions, though it is not clear whether any of them will go to trial before the Nov. 5 presidential election. Two accuse him of trying to overturn his 2020 election loss to Biden, while another accuses him of mishandling classified documents after leaving office. He has pleaded not guilty in all three cases.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

I wonder how sleepy farting Don is going to con his way out of all this criminality, when there's overwhelming evidence against him..the original plan get elected president but that could fail ...then what...
Extortion, forgery, any taxes paid on that? What a great lawyer, which college did he attend?
maybe your Orange Messiah should have done some checking before hiring him?
if trump was innocent he wouldn't have paid extortion - lol, his lawyers shade the truth almost as much as he does - given the number of affairs he had, he's lucky only two hit him up for money
What did Bill Clinton pay to go away? Russian troll.
you'll have to excuse mark. he wasn't old enough at the time to understand Clinton's troubles and they weren't reported much in the Russian press.
Brad, With Slick Willy the question is not what, but who- and he won't be coming back.
when will trumps wife be called as a witness? she can offer circumstantial evidence about the time trump cheated on her after giving birth to his son..
..though, you will probably read a word or two in your overpriced trump-bible, then go back to sleep..
Trump also cheated on her before she gave birth. But she's ok with it ... it's not like she loves him or never cheated herself. She wants him convicted so she'll get more $ in her future divorce case, but why divorce if he'll be dead from old age soon anyway?
@Marki: Stormy is not Trump's wife. Trump didn't pay enough for that. ;-)
Binance CEO bekommt 4 Monaten für Geldwäshe Terro Unterstützung Steuer Hinterziehung
Der Richter ist ein Demokrat
anyone else would already be in jail for his contempt
nobody else would ever be charged with such a sham. he did not say anything about the jury. it's OK, America is watching and will be electing him back in soon
LOL LOLL LOL sure with his Trump Bible in hand what a fool
if that were true, he'd have zero need to make threats about post election upheaval when he loses - he broke the law - he's manipulated and intimidated all along - he's being held accountable just like in his libel case - 90 million and counting there - here so far its only 9k - but this is a criminal matter and cash slap only happen so many times before the crowbar hotel
repeating violating judge's order is a great way to get the jury on your side, great legal strategy, keep it up Donald
The judge is a Biden loyalist, and his family has made over 10 million from the DNC. It is a total scam. including the fake charges.
Not just violating judge's order, also threatening the very jurors who will decide verdict.
marki hasn't looked at the evidence that will get him convicted, much of it created by Trump himself.
In the land of the mice. who is going to bell the cat? One that feed on KFC and grow fat and fart aloud and sleep alot.
you've been in court, smelling trump farts have you - lucky, tough ticket to get - lol
Farting ... must be eating too many McDonald's (he prefer McDonald's because he thinks it's name after him) cheeseburgers and he's lactose-intolerant.
just lock him up its simple
Total B. S. Trial.
why? if they find that trump broke the law, he must be held accountable. if he did not break the law, he will walk free. got a problem with that?
Quite a country - Conroy said prosecutors are not yet asking for Trump to be jailed.
You're right, it would be a better if Trump were jail for repeatedly violating gag orders, but he's a rich, white, male cult leader so he gets special privileges.
that judge doesn't have the courage to jail Trump. Just talk.
merchan might jail Trump. if only merchan had a set.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.