🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

Texas woman files lawsuit asking court to allow emergency abortion

Published 12/05/2023, 05:30 PM
Updated 12/05/2023, 06:00 PM
© Reuters. Pro-choice stickers adorn staff desks at Houston Women's Reproductive Services in Texas, U.S., October 1, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) - A Texas woman on Tuesday asked a court to allow her to obtain an abortion despite the state's near-total ban on the procedure, saying her fetus was likely not viable and her continued pregnancy threatened her health.

In a first-of-its-kind lawsuit filed in Travis County, Texas District Court against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Kate Cox, who is 20 weeks pregnant, sought a temporary restraining order allowing a doctor to perform an abortion without being prosecuted. She urged the court to rule "expeditiously."

Cox said her fetus had recently been diagnosed with a genetic abnormality called trisomy 18, which typically does not result in a viable pregnancy.

Cox's doctors told her that, if born alive, her baby would likely only survive for days, according to the lawsuit. Cox in the lawsuit said because she had two previous Caesarian sections, she would need to have a third one if she continues the pregnancy, which could jeopardize her ability to have more children, the complaint said.

"Yet because of Texas's abortion bans, Ms. Cox's physicians have informed her that their 'hands are tied' and she will have to wait until her baby dies inside her or carry the pregnancy to term, at which point she will be forced to have a third C-section, only to watch her baby suffer until death," the lawsuit said.

Texas's abortion ban includes only a narrow exception to save the mother's life or prevent substantial impairment of a major bodily function. Cox's lawsuit asks the court to rule that the abortion she seeks falls under that exception, and that enforcing the ban against her in these circumstances would violate the state constitution.

Cox's husband, Justin Cox, and Damla Karsan, an OBGYN who says she would perform the abortion if not for the ban are also plaintiffs.

© Reuters. Pro-choice stickers adorn staff desks at Houston Women's Reproductive Services in Texas, U.S., October 1, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

Paxton did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Karsan is also one of 22 plaintiffs in a separate lawsuit seeking a broader order protecting Texas women's right to abortions their doctors deem medically necessary, in which the state's highest court heard arguments last week. The court has not ruled in that case.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.