Get 40% Off
🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

Trump lawyer questions Stormy Daniels' account of sex with Trump

Published 05/09/2024, 06:03 AM
Updated 05/09/2024, 10:06 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Adult-film actress Stephanie Clifford, also known as Stormy Daniels, poses for pictures at the end of her striptease show in Gossip Gentleman club in Long Island, New York, U.S., February 23, 2018. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo

By Luc Cohen and Jody Godoy

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Donald Trump's lawyer sought to show inconsistencies in porn star Stormy Daniels' various tellings of a 2006 sexual encounter she has said she had with Trump, part of an effort on Thursday to undermine her credibility as a witness in the first criminal trial of a sitting or former U.S. president.

Her unflattering account of a sexual encounter with Trump in a Lake Tahoe hotel suite while he was married to his wife Melania riveted jurors on Tuesday and reminded U.S. voters of some of the more lurid aspects of his 2017-2021 presidency as he campaigns to win back the White House this year.

Facing questioning on Thursday by defense lawyer Susan Necheles in a Manhattan courtroom, Daniels stuck to her account.

"You're trying to make me say that it changed, but it hasn't changed," Daniels told Necheles.

Trump, 77, has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen's $130,000 payment to Daniels, 45, for her silence ahead of the 2016 U.S. presidential election about the alleged encounter. Trump has denied ever having sex with Daniels.

Trump, the Republican candidate challenging Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 U.S. election, has called the trial a politically motivated attempt to undermine his campaign.

Prosecutors have said Trump's efforts to obscure the paper trail for the payment to Daniels corrupted the 2016 election in which he defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton by preventing voters from learning about a story that might have swayed their vote. 

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

After testimony ended on Thursday, Trump lawyer Todd Blanche once again asked Justice Juan Merchan to declare a mistrial on the basis of Daniels' testimony.

Blanche argued that her detailed testimony about the alleged sexual encounter, including her statement that Trump was not wearing a condom, had veered into territory that was irrelevant to the case and would prejudice jurors against Trump.  

"This is not a case about sex," Blanche said. "This is not a case about whether that incident took place or didn't take place."

Merchan denied the request, saying that because Blanche had argued in his opening statement on April 22 that the encounter never happened prosecutors were allowed to try to rehabilitate Daniels' credibility.

"Your denial puts the jury in a position of having to choose who they believe," Merchan said. 

The judge also denied a similar request on Tuesday. 

In addition, Blanche requested that a gag order restricting Trump's public comments about jurors and witnesses be loosened to let the defendant publicly respond to questions about Daniels' testimony. Merchan also denied that request, stating that other witnesses may see Trump's comments and become concerned that he would say similar things about them. 

Christopher Conroy, a prosecutor, suggested that the proper way for Trump to respond to Daniels would be to testify in his own defense. Trump before the trial told reporters he would testify, though it remains to be seen whether he will do so.

"There is a proceeding here that this (gag) order is designed to protect," Conroy said. "If somebody wants to respond to something that's said in this room, that can happen in this room."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The judge has fined Trump $10,000 for running afoul of the gag order 10 times, and said further violations could land him in jail.

DEFENSE SAYS DANIELS 'MADE ALL THIS UP'

In nearly four hours of cross-examination on Tuesday and Thursday, Necheles asked Daniels about her earlier testimony of the alleged encounter compared with versions in a book she wrote and interviews she gave over the years.

She asked Daniels why in a 2018 interview to Vogue magazine she did not mention that Trump's bodyguard had been outside the hotel room where the encounter happened. Daniels on Tuesday had testified that her awareness of the bodyguard's presence contributed to a power imbalance with Trump that left her feeling uncomfortable.

"You made all this up, right?" Necheles asked Daniels at one point.

"No," Daniels said emphatically, sitting with her hands folded and legs crossed. 

Just before ending the cross-examination, Necheles asked Daniels if she had knowledge of Trump's business records - part of an effort to paint her testimony as irrelevant to the false business records charges at hand. 

"I know nothing about his business records, no," Daniels said. "Why would I?" 

Daniels completed her testimony, with a combined seven hours on the witness stand over two days.

Former Trump White House aide Madeline Westerhout took the witness stand on Thursday afternoon and told jurors about checks he signed while in office. Westerhout is expected to return to the witness stand on Friday. 

This is the first of four criminal cases against Trump to go to trial. He has pleaded not guilty in all of them. 

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

nope, not a big trump fan...spends too much. I haven't worked in 15 yrs. Been living off investments. as usual wrong about everything
run away...heh max the more on
remember, 'william', it's your only way out of the trailer park..
'william hagerty' is another orange mushroom-gobbler..
Maxime when the going gets tough you run away...a ferret
The democrats only hope of keeping Trump out of office is quickly falling apart.
still finishing high school in Moscow, were you?
not even clever... another dumb donkey
Tre I'm betting my IQ is twice what yours is....
So I guess Stormcloud blacked out, Trump walked out of the room, his man at the door came in for a quickie, and then Trump came back in and asked her - How was I ? - . Prove me wrong.
But Trump claims he hired the best people.
Totally Irrelevant. This isn't a sexual assault case. She even admitted that it was consensual, albeit unpleasant. She's simply a witness to help establish Trump's motive for the actual crime he is on trial for which is falsifying business records in an attempt to hide a campaign violation.
*This isn't a sexual assault case* - nobody said it was, well other than when Ship confessing his sexual fantasy above....
Sell DIS
Talk about liars....I just said inflation was 9% when I took office.
If you can't trust a second rate porn star who can you trust?
Certainly not the orange ex-Liar-in-Chief.
She signed a statement saying it never happened.
Irrelevant to the case, Joe, and she's not the one on trial. She's only a witness for the purpose of showing Trump's motivation for the charges that he's on trial for.
So motivation is a crime?
D'uh. Of course motivation matters. If you run over someone with your car because your brakes failed, not a crime. If you stomp on the accelerator and steer at them because you intend to kill them: a crime. If you record a business record as legal fees because they were legal fees, not a crime. If you record payments as legal fees because you were trying to conceal their true purpose: a crime.
Trumps fluffers and beta simps stand ready and willing to provide him comfort in these trying times.
I love to see Daniels beating trump at his own game.. this is excellent PR for her, and she can probably score some nice tv/book/podcast-deals after this..
i hope she ask the lawyer to clarify, if he wants her to tell the court exactly how small tiny hands wee wee is - trump can then nod or whip it out to show evidence - lol
yeah still TDS but the D doesn't stand for Derangement.
Then we can all whine as much as Trump about gagging. ;-)
well if isn't Maxime the more-on
Maybe the Judge will take a $10,000 IOU from the $500,000 account that Daniels owes Trump, and use it towards his gagging order fines.
OK by the logic, since you have no problem letting the judge have the power to take money to pay the moneyowe in other trials, you wouldn't mind letting him taking money from your Orange Messiah's account to pay the $83m defamation judgement, right?
Trumps just sore Stormy told the Court just how small Donald J. Trumpturd really is!!!!!
Trump has many of his other NDAs ruled unenforceable. Stormy's NDA, being involved with fraud, will likely be unenforceable, too.
Kabuki theater.
Max...more on speaks again
blowjoe.. a regular orange mushroom-gobbler along with the communist 'ILoveDP' here, who 'takes care' of his sons...
..and little william likes to watch them all while touching himself and licking the others clean.. a nasty circus indeed...
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.