Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Ohio to keep ballot-box limits for now after judge calls them 'unreasonable'

Published 09/15/2020, 12:46 PM
Updated 09/15/2020, 04:40 PM
© Reuters. A voters completes a paper ballot at the Butler County Board of Elections office in Hamilton

By Andy Sullivan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Ohio's top election official declined to loosen restrictions on absentee-ballot drop boxes on Tuesday after a state judge ruled they were "arbitrary and unreasonable" and said local officials should be able to install more if they wish.

The ruling initially appeared to be a victory for Democrats who have pressed for more drop boxes to accommodate voters who don't want to return absentee ballots by mail in the Nov. 3 presidential election.

But Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, a Republican, will not change rules that only allow one drop box for each of the state's 88 counties, spokeswoman Maggie Sheehan said.

"Today's ruling didn't change anything, and the secretary's directive remains in place," she said.

Drop boxes have become a partisan flash point in the presidential election. Democrats have promoted them as a reasonable and reliable option for voters unnerved by the COVID-19 pandemic and U.S. Postal Service delivery problems.

Republican officials and President Donald Trump's campaign have sought to limit them in many states, arguing without evidence that the receptacles could enable voting fraud.

In Ohio, LaRose's restrictions leave the 864,000 registered voters of Cuyahoga County, a Democratic stronghold, with the same number of drop boxes as the 8,400 registered voters of Republican-leaning Vinton County.

Opinion polls show Trump holding a narrow lead over Democratic rival Joe Biden in Ohio.

Ohio Judge Richard Frye ruled that local authorities can set up more drop boxes. "Wholly arbitrary rules are entitled to no deference," he wrote.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Democrats said that should allow local officials to set up more drop boxes if they wish.

But the judge's decision did not strike down the rule outright, and Sheehan indicated LaRose may appeal. "Ohioans are fortunate that the judicial branch offers the opportunity to appeal a single trial judge's opinion," she said.

Ohio Representative Paula Hicks-Hudson, a Democrat, said LaRose had told her he would follow any court ruling, rather than pursue an appeal. "I'm calling on the secretary of state to keep his word," she said on a conference call.

Democrats and Republicans have waged a state-by-state battle over absentee voting procedures ahead of the election, which could see up to half of all ballots sent through the mail.

In Pennsylvania, the state's top election official said on Monday that local officials can't discard returned mail ballots if the signature does not resemble one kept on file.

In Arizona, a federal judge ruled last week that state officials must give voters a chance to fix ballots that are returned without a signature, rather than rejecting them outright.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.