Get 40% Off
🎁 Free Gift Friday: Copy Legendary Investors' Portfolios in One ClickCopy for Free

Arizona abortion ruling will set women back 'more than a century,' White House says

Published 09/24/2022, 10:45 AM
Updated 09/24/2022, 12:46 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Fencing including razor wire forms a barrier to the Arizona state Capitol complex after it was installed following protests against the United States Supreme Court after it overturned the landmark Roe v Wade abortion decision, in Phoenix, Ariz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Friday's ruling allowing Arizona to enforce a ban on nearly all abortions, if allowed to stand, will result in "catastrophic, dangerous, and unacceptable" consequences for women, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Saturday.

An Arizona judge ruled on Friday that a 1901 ban on nearly all abortions in the state can be enforced after being blocked for about 50 years.

"Yesterday’s ruling in Arizona is dangerous and will set Arizona women back more than a century – to a time before Arizona was even a state," Jean-Pierre said in a statement.

The decision would force survivors of rape and incest to bear the children of their assaulters, while leaving health care providers to face imprisonment of up to five years for fulfilling their duty of care, she said.

"While we await next steps on any implementation of the law, the potential consequences of this ruling are catastrophic, dangerous, and unacceptable" she said.

Jean-Pierre said U.S. President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris would continue to push Congress to codify the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion that was overturned by the Supreme Court in June.

The Arizona ruling by Pima County Superior Court Judge Kellie Johnson granted a request by the state's Republican attorney general to lift a court injunction that had barred enforcement of Arizona's pre-statehood ban on abortion after the Supreme Court decision.

Johnson's ruling bans all abortions in Arizona except when the procedure is necessary to save the mother's life.

Biden suggested on Friday that the election of two more Democratic senators in November elections would open the possibility of Democrats removing the filibuster, a legislative roadblock that requires a 60-vote majority to overcome, which would enable Congress to restore federal abortion rights.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Democrats hold a bare majority in the Senate now, and two Democratic senators, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema, have opposed ending the filibuster.

Ending the filibuster would require a simple majority. For any such move to be successful, Democrats need to retain control of the House and gain two seats in the Senate. Most forecasters suggest Republicans are likely to gain House control.

Latest comments

Then move to a different state. This is why there are different laws in different states.
Why do you support Russia?
You always frame your questions right off the bat to paint people in a predetermined light. This is federalism, like it or not. The same federalism that "saved" you from Trump. My comment did not reference my viewpoint on ****but rather federalism. If you don't like the laws in a state don't live there, simple
You always frame your questions right off the bat to paint people in a predetermined light. This is federalism, like it or not. The same federalism that "saved" you from Trump. My comment did not reference my viewpoint on ********but rather federalism. If you don't like the laws in a state don't live there, simple.
republicans would love to set women back to last century! why the fear of women? because they are denying them bodily autonomy and freedoms! america's taliban?
republicans dont care about women, their medical needs, they get their undies tied in knot when they hear, Liz, Nancy, kamala, AOC. inferiority complex?
Uh, yeah. A ruling that reinstates a law from 1901, before women could even vote, by definition sets women back a century.
the Republicans are America's taliban! vote them out!
the Republicans are America's taliban! vote them out!
women dont get pregnant by themselves! hold the men responsible for the costs, and you will see how fast roe will be approved!
republicans dont think women should give consent before being groped? vote them out!
Republicans want to take us backwards to the past! no future! vote them out!
Or women can figure out how to NOT get knocked up if they don’t want kids, and of course come to understand that men also have reproductive rights. Women need to return to conservative lifestyles and quit acting like #&$*.
men have no personal responsibilities? vote Republican chauvinists out!
Who among you have any sincere and actual interest in the lives and well being of the unborn before and after they are born? Virtually none as far as I can tell.
Like I said - in the abstract - because some are sincere. The rest, most, are smug.
There is no restoration of constitutional rights for baby sacrifices, because it never existed. A definite #Libtaarrd wrote this Reuters article. Congress cannot pass anything, because the Supreme Court already returned the issue to the states.
John, you need to go back to Civics class and learn how the system works. Of course Congress can write and pass a new law. The Supreme Court just returned the issue to the states under the (current) federal law.
@john You need to tell that to Lindsey Graham.
A great day for innocent babes! May God shine His light on Arizona and fill her lakes to the brim! Arizona  should now get busy creating a state-of-the-art infrastructure of support for all mothers. Hopefully, one that will become an inspiration for other states still struggling to find a way to end this barbaric practice.
#libtaaarrd
John Hat #Trumptaaarrd
 Their parents OF COURSE! duh..
Dont have ********unless you want children you perverts. Use birth control and contraceptives of you dont want children. If you are the victim of ****there shall be a loop hole , or just go to California
They bleeped me out so quit
Why is it so important for Democrats to *****their offspring?
K I l l their offspring
Thats all they have left
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.