🔮 Better than the Oracle? Our Fair Value found this +42% bagger 5 months before Buffett bought itRead More

24 Republican-led states sue Biden administration over water regulations

Published 02/16/2023, 05:41 PM
Updated 02/16/2023, 07:15 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Republican senate nominee Patrick Morrisey speaks with a supporter at a blacksmith's forge ahead of the 2018 midterm elections in Falling Water, West Virginia, U.S., November 4, 2018.      REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
WAT
-
LNN
-

By Clark Mindock

West Virginia and 23 other Republican-led states sued the federal government on Thursday, alleging the Biden administration’s rule establishing protections for seasonal streams and wetlands under a landmark environmental law violates the U.S. Constitution and sows confusion for landowners.

The lawsuit filed in North Dakota federal court seeks to stop the rule, which defines which of the so-called "Waters (NYSE:WAT) of the United States" are regulated under the Clean Water Act, from taking effect next month.

Finalized in December, the rule protects waterways that have a “significant nexus” to navigable U.S. waters – a standard that ranchers, developers and other industry groups have said is overly broad and creates burdensome permitting and regulatory hurdles.

"This is a textbook case of federal overreach," said Patrick Morrisey, West Virginia's attorney general, during a press conference.

The EPA didn't immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.

The lawsuit is the latest front in the protracted battle over the scope of the Clean Water Act and what waterways the federal government has the authority to regulate.

Texas and industry groups led by the American Farm Bureau Federation filed separate lawsuits last month challenging the rule. Previous efforts by the Obama and Trump administrations to define the law's scope also faced numerous legal challenges.

The Biden administration rule would protect wetlands and seasonal streams, not just permanent waterways like the rivers and lakes they feed into. Those smaller waterways were largely eliminated from protections by a Trump administration rule.

The Biden administration signaled its intent to replace that rule in June 2021. EPA Administrator Michael Regan said then that the narrower Trump-era approach was particularly impactful in arid states like New Mexico and Arizona, where nearly every one of the seasonal 1,500 streams lost protections.

The Trump-era rule had been vacated by an Arizona federal court in August 2021, which restored previous standards while the Biden administration worked on its changes.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Floodwaters inundate acres of vineyards at the Balletto Vineyards after a new bout of rainstorms in Santa Rosa, California, U.S. January 5, 2023.  REUTERS/Peter DaSilva

The case is State of West Virginia et al. V. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al., U.S. District Court for the District of North Carolina, case No. 3:23-cv-00032.

For the states: West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, Solicitor General Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) See and Senior Deputy Solicitor General Michael Williams

For the EPA: Counsel not immediately available

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.