Get 40% Off
🔥 This hedge fund gained 26.16% in the last month. Get their top stocks with our free stock ideas tool.See stock ideas

Delaware Court revives case over Pincus's Zynga stock sale

Published 12/05/2016, 07:00 PM
Updated 12/05/2016, 07:20 PM
© Reuters. The Zynga logo is pictured at the company's headquarters in San Francisco
ZNGA
-

By Tom Hals

WILMINGTON, Del. (Reuters) - The Delaware Supreme Court revived a lawsuit against Zynga Inc's (O:ZNGA) controlling shareholder, Mark Pincus, and fellow board members for allegedly allowing leaders of the social gaming company to act on inside information and dump stock before it crashed in 2012.

Delaware's high court ruled that the Court of Chancery erred when it dismissed the lawsuit against the board of Zynga, which created the online game Farmville, in February for procedural reasons.

The ruling clears the way for the 2014 lawsuit by shareholder Thomas Sandys to proceed to discovery and trial, or for new motions to dismiss. Neither court has considered the merits of the allegations.

A Zynga spokeswoman declined to comment.

Sandys' lawsuit alleged that Zynga's board exempted top managers and directors, including former Chief Executive Officer Pincus, from a rule restricting stock sales until three days after an earnings announcement.

The group of insiders then sold 20.3 million shares of stock for $236.7 million in a secondary offering at $12 per share, according to court records, with Pincus selling $192 million of stock. Three weeks later, the company announced its earnings, sending the stock tumbling to $8.52, and three months later it fell to $3.18.

Sandys sued Pincus and others on behalf of Zynga, in what is known as a derivative action. Any settlement or judgment in the case will be paid to Zynga, not directly to shareholders.

The lower court dismissed the case because it found Sandys failed to show that a majority of the board was too conflicted to consider bringing the lawsuit, which would clear the way for a shareholder to pursue the case.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Supreme Court found the lower court should have determined six of the board's directors were not impartial, not just three.

The high court focused on Ellen Siminoff, whose husband co-owned an aircraft with Pincus, and William Gordon and John Doerr, partners at venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

The firm is a major investor in Zynga and also One Kings Lane, a company co-founded by Pincus's wife.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo Strine said in the opinion those sort of relationships made it impossible for those directors to impartially consider suing Pincus. "Causing a lawsuit to be brought against another person is no small matter, and is the sort of thing that might plausibly endanger a relationship."

Zynga stock on Monday closed at $2.95, up 3.15 percent, on Nasdaq.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.