Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolios

US appeals court blocks venture capital fund's grant program for Black women

Published 09/30/2023, 12:35 PM
Updated 09/30/2023, 06:40 PM
© Reuters

By Nate Raymond

(Reuters) -A federal appeals court on Saturday blocked a venture capital fund from moving forward with a program that awards funding to businesses run by Black women in a case by the anti-affirmative action activist behind the successful U.S. Supreme Court challenge to race-conscious college admissions policies.

The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a 2-1 vote granted a request by Edward Blum's American Alliance for Equal Rights to temporarily block Fearless Fund from considering applications for grants only from businesses led by Black women.

Blum's group asked the court to do so while it appealed a judge's Tuesday ruling denying it a preliminary injunction blocking Fearless Fund from moving forward with its "racially exclusive program." Grant applications were due Saturday.

The judges in the majority, U.S. Circuit Judges Robert Luck and Andrew Brasher, agreed with Blum's group that Fearless Fund's "racially exclusionary" grant program likely violated Section 1981 of the 1866 Civil Rights Act, a Civil War-era law that bars racial bias in contracting.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash earlier this week concluded that under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment's free speech protections, Fearless Fund had a right to express its belief in the importance of Black women to the economy through charity.

But the appeals court's majority, comprised of two appointees of Republican former President Donald Trump, said the First Amendment "does not give the defendants the right to exclude persons from a contractual regime based on race."

Blum in a statement said his group was "gratified that the 11th Circuit has recognized the likelihood that the Fearless Strivers Grant Contest is illegal." Defense lawyers said they planned to seek further appellate review.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"We remain committed to defending our clients’ meaningful work," said Jason Schwartz, a lawyer for Fearless Fund.

Fearless Fund describes itself as "built by women of color for women of color."

The lawsuit is one of three that Blum's Texas-based group has filed since August challenging grant and fellowship programs designed by the venture capital fund and two law firms to help give Black, Hispanic and other underrepresented minority groups greater career opportunities.

A different group founded by Blum, who is white, was behind the litigation that led to the June decision, powered by the Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority, declaring unlawful race-conscious student admissions policies used by Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.

According to the Fearless Fund, businesses owned by Black women in 2022 received less than 1% of the $288 billion that venture capital firms deployed.

The fund aims to address that disparity, and counts JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM), Bank of America and MasterCard as investors. It has invested nearly $27 million in 40 businesses led by minority women since its founding in 2019.

It also provides grants, and Blum's lawsuit took aim at its Fearless Strivers Grant Contest, which awards Black women who own small businesses $20,000 in grants and other resources to grow their businesses.

The fund argued Blum was trying to "turn a seminal civil rights statute on its head" by suing it under a Civil War-era law enacted to protect formerly enslaved Black people from racial bias.

U.S. Circuit Judge Charles Wilson, an appointee of Democratic former President Bill Clinton, in a dissenting opinion on Saturday called it a "perversion" of Congress' intent to use that law against a remedial program like Fearless Fund's.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

 

Latest comments

being born a white male, I am already at an advantage. anyone failing to capitalise on this, it's your own fault, so stop bitc#ing.. being born a woman of color, you are already at a disadvantage, and you have to work a lot harder to make it. and that's a fact...
More bs about how the people are different from eachother and how we are separated by race and sex. Goverments way of dividing us. Fringe rep and dems are the problem pushing programs that no one white or black male or female want. Its the people and the goverment not rep vs dems or white vs black or male vs female. Keep on with the bs reuters. I believe people see through it
What policy have republicans pushed that discriminates based on skin color and gender? It is only the democrats who are pushing such policies.
If the court ruled that it is legal for people to disseminate based on skin color like democrats want, then what would prevent white people from starting a similar fund and only provide funding to white businesses? Would democrats have an issue with that? The modern democrat party is just like the KKK, which makes sense because the KKK was founded by democrats.
*discriminate
Reuters is a liberal rag.
You really hurt your argument that the US is systemically racist against black people when national media outlets like Reuters capitalize the word "black" but not "white".
Title correction: "Far left black supremacists have racist program shut down by the court"
This is overt racism, just like Reuters which is racist by doing things like capitalizing the word "black" but not "white". Democrats are constantly having their racism policies knocked down by the courts, like the racist admission practices of colleges. People are not racist, they just know that if a black doctor got into med school with scores half as good as white and asian doctors, why would you trust the black doctor?
Lol 💩💩
$1,864.60/ounce LOL
"the 1866 Civil Rights Act" Good lord.
While affirmative action is akin to communism and ends with failure as well, private or non government investors should be allowed to do and invest in what they want.  This request, which the court ruled in favor of, sets a bad precedent as it allows government or the courts more say in the private business.
lemme guess. You are white. clearly
 So what that I am white? Do you have problems with this?
its very simple; replace the word black with white and see what you think.  I'm going to guess your tone changes.  It's amazing to me that "progressive" people think ACTUAL systemic racism things like this are GOOD...
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.