Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Twitter's account of deal shows Musk signing without asking for more info

Published 05/17/2022, 06:12 AM
Updated 05/18/2022, 03:00 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Elon Musk's Twitter profile is seen on a smartphone placed on printed Twitter logos in this picture illustration taken April 28, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

By Greg Roumeliotis and Tom Hals

(Reuters) - Twitter Inc (NYSE:TWTR) published its account on Tuesday of its deal negotiations with Elon Musk, showing he opted out of asking the questions about the social media company's business he has now cited in declaring the $44 billion acquisition is "on hold."

The account, published in Twitter's proxy statement that outlines what shareholders need to know to vote on the deal, paints a picture of Musk in a rush to clinch a deal with his "best and final" offer.

Musk negotiated the Twitter deal over the weekend of April 23 and April 24 without carrying out any due diligence, the proxy statement shows.

Since signing the deal on April 25, Musk has questioned the accuracy of Twitter's public filings about spam accounts representing less than 5% of its user base, claiming they must be at least 20%. This is despite Twitter stating in its filings that the numbers could be higher than it estimates.

Independent researchers have projected that 9% to 15% of the millions of Twitter profiles are bots.

Musk tweeted on Tuesday that Twitter Chief Executive Parag Agrawal has refused to show proof for his company's estimate and that the deal cannot move forward until he does. Twitter's proxy statement shows that in the run-up to the deal Musk made no effort to get information about the issue.

"Mr. Musk did not ask to enter into a confidentiality agreement or seek from Twitter any non-public info regarding Twitter," Twitter said in its proxy statement.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The proxy statement makes no mention of threats Musk has tweeted about not going ahead with the deal if he does not get to the bottom of how many spam accounts are on the platform.

Twitter investors appeared convinced that a deal at the agreed price was now out of the question. Twitter shares were trading around $37.55 on Tuesday afternoon, a discount of more than 30% to the $54.20 per share deal price.

Musk suggested for the first time on Monday at a conference in Miami that the deal could be done at a lower price, without specifying what that could be. He has yet to inform Twitter that he wants to renegotiate the deal.

Legal experts have said Musk would likely lose in court if he tried to walk away from a deal. But they say that any litigation would likely be protracted and cast uncertainty over Twitter's business. Even companies that have prevailed in court over their acquirers have ended up negotiating financial settlements.

Musk is contractually obligated to pay a $1 billion break-up fee if he does not complete the deal, but Twitter can sue for "specific performance" to force Musk to complete a deal and obtain a settlement from him as a result.

Ann Lipton, a professor at Tulane University Law School, said the fact that Musk had not asked Twitter for information before signing the deal meant he would now have to show that the company's public filings were wrong and posed significant long-term financial issues - a high legal bar.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"Twitter has long said 'this is our estimate of spam but we might be wrong.' So it's not clear that they said anything false," Lipton said.

COMMITTED TO THE DEAL

Twitter said on Tuesday it remained committed to the deal at the agreed price and expected it to be completed in 2022.

The San Francisco-based company said in its proxy statement that Musk expressed his interest in joining its board or taking it private on March 26. This would indicate that Musk mischaracterized his stake of more than 9% in Twitter as passive when he revealed it in a regulatory filing on April 4. He subsequently clarified it was an active stake.

Representatives of Musk did not respond to requests for comment.

Musk also told Twitter that he contemplated starting a competitor, according to the proxy statement.

Twitter's CEO, Agrawal, is entitled to a $60.2 million golden parachute if the deal closes, while the company's chief financial officer, Ned Segal, would get $46.4 million, the proxy shows. Twitter's top lawyer, Vijaya Gadde, would be paid $30 million.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:GS) stands to be paid $65 million for advising Twitter once the deal is completed, having already been paid $15 million, the proxy statement shows.

Another Twitter adviser, JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM), stands to be paid $48 million once the deal closes, having already made $5 million for its fairness opinion to the company.

Latest comments

I dont blame the fakeness on the social media companies, I blame the gullible users on these platform, they eat the BS right up, mangea, mangea.
Well i strongly believe that the deal will pull through…
"Musk negotiated the Twitter deal over the weekend of April 23 and April 24 without carrying out any due diligence......"  --  you still think Elon Musk is serious in getting this deal done?
musk is only doing this to carry favor with trump. not sure why. he will never close that deal. if he buys it, he will be trump's competitor not boot licker.
 "if he buys it, he will be trump's competitor"  -- would he be?  let's be honest here, that Truth Social thing is never going to be a realistic Twitter competitor.....I mean, even Trump is hardly using it
When Twitter reaches $18, Musk will say goodbye to Twitter. Twitter is 100% fake
"Twitter is 100% fake" until Twitter banned fakers like Trump.
The last thing Twitter wants is to sue Musk and have thier books and practices public knowledge. They would open themselves up to more than 1B in valuation erotion, litigation and potential criminal charges for company leadership.
"erotion"  -- stop talking dirty
Experienced negotiator: people negotiate differently and context is important, not every deal is the same.  In tight supply markets, tying up the property is the very first priority, then negotiate after property secured.
He must have been stoned.
well that's pretty much a given
This sounds like Musk's tactic to force the Twitter stockholders into voting yes. Making them think he's over paying and wants to back out. Reverse psychology 101.
If Twitter lied on it's financials and openly shared that to the public, how would Musk owe them $1bn? If anything Twitter would be sued into oblivion.
Did you read the article? Twitter said "this is an estimate and it could be wrong"....not sure how anyone could make that into a lie.
In other words, Musk owes them $1bn. Personally. And if he nitpicks TWTR's SEC filings, there's going to be a nitpicking of TSLA's.
There already has been nitpicking of TSLA’s filings. He’s been under scrutiny by the SEC for sometime.
$1b is cheap compare the $44b he committed to pay for a company that has never made money (and probably never will)
Repubicans are triggered
And the truth is this deal has little to do with left or right.
Really? due diligence in public... What a stunt! Probably came to conclusion faster than conventional means.
elon just wanted the attention, never intended to spend his own money. he would pump it the dump it!
Elon musk will back out
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.