Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Texas federal court will not adopt policy against 'judge shopping'

Published 03/30/2024, 02:28 PM
Updated 03/30/2024, 02:45 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Matthew Kacsmaryk, deputy counsel for the First Liberty Institute, answers questions during his nomination hearing by the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, U.S. December 13, 2017 in a s

By Nate Raymond

(Reuters) - A federal court in Texas that has become a favored destination for conservatives suing to block President Joe Biden's agenda has decided not to follow a policy adopted by the judiciary's top policymaking body that aims to curtail the practice of "judge shopping."

Chief U.S. District Judge David Godbey of the Northern District of Texas announced the decision in a Friday letter to Democratic U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who had urged him to implement a new policy that aimed to ensure cases challenging federal or state laws are randomly assigned judges.

The policy announced by the U.S. Judicial Conference on March 12 would require a lawsuit challenging federal or state laws to be assigned a judge randomly throughout a federal district rather than stay in the specific, smaller division, or courthouse, where the case was initially filed.

If implemented, that policy would disrupt a tactic used by conservative litigants of filing cases in small divisions in Texas' four federal districts whose one or two judges were appointed by Republican presidents and often rule in their favor on issues like abortion, immigration and gun control.

Following blowback from Senate Republicans and some conservative judges, judicial policymakers later clarified that the policy was discretionary, leaving it to each district court to decide how to implement it.

In his letter, Godbey, an appointee of Republican former President George W. Bush, said the judges in his district met on Wednesday. "The consensus was not to make any change to our case assignment process at this time," he said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

His letter was first reported by Law360. Schumer's spokespeople did not respond to a request for comment on Saturday.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas has 11 active judges and is divided into seven divisions. Most judges are in Dallas, but some smaller divisions like Amarillo, Fort Worth and Lubbock have just one or two active judges.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case arising from one of these small courts, in which U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk - an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump in the single-judge division of Amarillo - suspended approval of the abortion pill mifepristone.

The Supreme Court has allowed the pill to remain on the market while it considers the appeal. Justices signaled during Tuesday's arguments they were unlikely to uphold restrictions.

Latest comments

if your looking for a judge that supports the policies of an ex president that thinks he's above the law or supports his authoritarian bent then go to Texas.
the defendant should always be able to pick the judge they want to go before. seems fair
@Mark, even when that defendant was the one who appointed the judge? That doesn't seem fair compared to other citizens who never appointed any judges, does it.
This article is a joke. As if Dems don’t do the same damn thing.
man, you are dumb if you can’t see it. You have my pity, you parasite.
nope. A Constitutional Republic. Just as it’s stated in the Constitution.
@steve: We never said US is not a constitutional republic. It is, and is ALSO a representative democracy. That's the full truth. You are going with half lie, half truth.
Because repvblicans are scvm
I.o.w., retrumplican judges won't adopt anti-swampiness policy.
Biden and his Democrat cohorts should rather concentrate on finding people to go after President Trump who are not corrupt. Can they not find anyone objective, intelligent, and with some morals? Although given Biden and his families shenanigans, as well as other Democrats, they are so jaded they likely see corruption now as normal.
They person in charge of appointing special prosecutors is a Trump appointee.
Democrats LOVE judge shopping… until conservatives do it. Look ar the judges prosecuting Trump. THEY weren’t randomly picked.
Use your head ... why would Dems intentionally pick Aileen Cannon!?
Which of the judges in Trump's MANY legal cases, either cases with Trump as plaintiff or as defendant, were not randomly picked?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.