🔮 Better than the Oracle? Our Fair Value found this +42% bagger 5 months before Buffett bought itRead More

Pentagon eyes proposal for M&A changes in 'weeks'

Published 12/22/2015, 07:32 PM
© Reuters. US Defense Acquisition Chief Frank Kendall speaks to journalists at a news conference at the 2014 Farnborough International Airshow in Farnborough, southern England
BA
-
NOC
-
GD
-
LMT
-
RTX
-

By Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon and other U.S. government agencies should complete a legislative proposal in coming weeks to let regulators block proposed mergers for national security reasons, instead of just antitrust concerns, a top official said on Tuesday.

Defense Undersecretary Frank Kendall, who oversees arms weapons acquisitions and industrial base issues for the Pentagon, made the comments in an interview, after first mentioning the legislative push in September.

In September he raised concerns about further consolidation among the biggest players in the U.S. weapons industry, warning that big weapons makers were not hesitant to use the power that came with increased size for their own corporate advantage.

The comments came days after the U.S. Justice Department approved Lockheed Martin (N:LMT) Corp's $9 billion takeover of Sikorsky Aircraft from United Technologies Corp (N:UTX), one of the biggest acquisitions in the weapons industry in years.

At the time, Kendall said the U.S. Justice Department cleared Lockheed's acquisition of the helicopter maker because there was no direct anti-competitive issue, but the Pentagon did not want to see its industrial base whittled down to two or three very large suppliers.

On Tuesday, Kendall said the Pentagon was working with the Justice Department and other agencies on a proposal that would add a national security provision to current law, much as mergers in other industrial sectors are subject to a "public interest" provision since they serve the nation.

He said the proposal should be wrapped up soon and sent to lawmakers for their consideration.

Kendall said the prospects for getting the legislation passed in a presidential election year were unclear, but it was important to address the issue. "It's a debate we should have," he said.

Pentagon officials have said that further consolidation among prime contractors in the weapons industry could lead to higher costs, decreased innovation and less competition.

Dozens of companies in the sector merged in the 1990s as military spending fell sharply after the end of the Cold War. The changes left five large contractors that dominate the market: Lockheed, Boeing (N:BA) Co, Northrop Grumman Corp (N:NOC), General Dynamics Corp (N:GD) and Raytheon Co.

Kendall said the Lockheed-Sikorsky deal would move a high percentage of the military helicopter market into a company that already dominates the U.S. fighter jet market as the prime contractor on the $391 billion F-35 fighter jet program.

© Reuters. US Defense Acquisition Chief Frank Kendall speaks to journalists at a news conference at the 2014 Farnborough International Airshow in Farnborough, southern England

Lockheed said there was no evidence that larger defense companies reduced competition or inhibit innovation.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.