Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolios

Jury in Bard mesh trial won't hear about 2011 factory fire, judge rules

Published 06/12/2023, 04:56 PM
Updated 06/13/2023, 06:06 AM
© Reuters.
BDX
-

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) - Jurors in an upcoming trial in the case of a man who said he suffered chronic pain and other injuries from hernia repair mesh made by Becton, Dickinson and Co's C.R. Bard Inc unit will not be allowed to hear about a 2011 fire in one of the company's factories, a federal judge has ruled.

U.S. District Judge Edmund Sargus in Columbus, Ohio said in a written order Monday that the mesh used in plaintiff Aaron Stinson's surgery did not come from the Puerto Rican factory, and in any case had been manufactured four years later. He said the federal rules of evidence did not allow Stinson to use evidence not directly related to his injury to try to prove a general pattern of unsafe conduct.

Stinson alleges that the PerFix Plug mesh used to repair his hernia in 2015 caused extensive scarring, requiring a follow-up surgery in 2017 to remove it, and that he continues to experience chronic pain and other complications.

His trial, scheduled for October, will be the third so-called bellwether trial out of more than 19,000 cases over Bard's hernia mesh before Sargus. Bellwether trials are chosen in federal mass torts to test the strength of the claims and help the parties potentially come to a settlement.

"Plaintiff may not use evidence of the 2011 line fire to show that defendants' [quality management] systems were deficient at the time of the fire, and therefore must have been deficient when plaintiff's device was manufactured," he wrote.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"The line fire evidence is just a gnat on the elephant's butt when it comes to the PerFix Plug liability story so we'll be just fine without that evidence," Timothy O'Brien of Levin Papantonio Rafferty, a lawyer for Stinson, said in an email.

A lawyer for Bard did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Bard won the first bellwether trial over its hernia mesh in 2021. The second bellwether ended with a $255,000 verdict for the plaintiff last year.

Some cases over Bard hernia mesh are also pending in state courts, one of which resulted in a $4.8 million verdict in Rhode Island last year.

The case is In re: Davol Inc/C.R. Bard Inc Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, No. 2:18-md-02846, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

For Stinson and other plaintiffs: Timothy O'Brien of Levin Papantonio Rafferty and Kelsey Stokes of Fleming Nolen & Jez

For Bard: Michael Brown of Reed Smith

Read more:

R.I. jury orders Becton Dickinson (NYSE:BDX) to pay $4.8 mln in hernia mesh trial

Becton Dickinson ordered to pay $255k in hernia mesh trial

Becton Dickinson faces first bellwether trial over hernia mesh

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.