Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Wall Street near flat after First Republic news, awaiting Fed

Published 05/01/2023, 06:48 AM
Updated 05/01/2023, 06:41 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., April 19, 2023.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

By Caroline Valetkevitch

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended little changed on Monday as investors took in the weekend auction of First Republic Bank (NYSE:FRC) and braced for this week's expected interest rate hike from the Federal Reserve.

The KBW regional banking index dropped 2.7%, while shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM), which won the auction of failed lender First Republic, rose 2.1%.

JPMorgan will pay the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp $10.6 billion to take control of most of the regional bank's assets.

Investors have been on edge about the banking system's health following the collapse of two other regional banks in March.

"Hopefully this is sort of the last of the banking crisis, but something else might surface at some point," said Tim Ghriskey, senior portfolio strategist at Ingalls & Snyder in New York.

Market watchers also digested the latest economic news, which suggested to some that the Fed may need to stick to its tightening cycle for the near term. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) said on Monday its manufacturing PMI rose last month from March.

The Fed, which has been raising rates to cool inflation, is expected to hike rates an additional 25 basis points on Wednesday.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 46.46 points, or 0.14%, to 34,051.7; the S&P 500 lost 1.61 points, or 0.04%, at 4,167.87; and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 13.99 points, or 0.11%, to 12,212.60.

Energy was down the most of the major S&P 500 sectors, falling 1.3% as crude oil prices declined .

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Recent earnings, however, provided some lingering optimism for investors, Ghriskey said. First-quarter results from S&P 500 companies have mostly beaten expectations, easing economic concerns.

"We've had good earnings relative to expectations. Analysts for now have backed off of lowering estimates," he said. "If we could have rates at this level ... and corporate America continue to deliver, it's very positive."

Recent upbeat earnings from Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Inc, Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:META) helped the benchmark S&P 500 notch its second consecutive month of gains on Friday.

The S&P 500 technology index climbed 0.2% on Monday, offsetting some of the day's weakness.

Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.24 billion shares, compared with the 10.37 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.

Declining issues outnumbered advancers on the NYSE by a 1.36-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.17-to-1 ratio favored decliners.

The S&P 500 posted 35 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 88 new highs and 188 new lows.

Latest comments

s even
us could default. omg
jpm also in trouble after helping frc
error, typo below---the regulators did warn SVB BK , several times.
(continued) Can not one know to spread their Bank Deposits and Brokerage among various Banks and Brokerages to stay below the 250k and 500k limits of ins protect and stay with high reputation, high longevity Institutions, Slow reasonable growth insttns, vs the faddish ones. People have some responsibility, and education, experience, consultation with pro's, with grandpa and ma, reading, and caution in degree to experience, expect rash decisions, realize with fastest growth opportunity comes increased risk, allocation, allocate risj, self,knowledge, can take more risk when young, when you are earning oran income stream, when have lots of assets. And there are losses and mistakes.IThat is the problem with poor education and lack of---no understanding of history, economics, the Depression, finance, not knowing of eras of bank failures in the past, war, periods of agricultural failure, economic failure, Robber Barron's, the Bible---save in the 7 good years for 7 bad years, drought.
Did not Bank Management err.in not considering rising interest rate environment, effect on long term treasuries value.I do not know if Regulators were supposed to pick up on this. In fact, did they not warn the bank or banks. in our capitalist or semi-captlst system-- 1. Is not failure part if the system?2. Do the regulators run the banks? Or are they somewhat guard-rails, warning system?3. Should this be so in banking vs restaurants, hotels, department stores3. It seems to me regulators, inspectors, licenses, etc should be strong in the parts where the public, customers cannot be expected to have the knowledge nor be able to evaluate hidden structures--:bridge structure, building structure, hidden assets, asset structure in banks & sophisticated arcane knowledge and there is insurance protection to a point--FDIC, SIPC, auto Ins, etc. That is why a licensed Housing Inspector is required to inspect before you buy a house. Health Ins, Medical Degree, Nursing, Engneerng.
Didn't they say that it was the last of the banking crisis last time? There's been some massive failures and all that toxic stuff has to go somewhere it doesn't just go to toxic asset heaven.
first please do some research before you input. had nothing to do with the regulations, you are just showing how much of a leftist hack you are
mark stop with the fox news misinformation, it had everything to do with the relaxation of banking regulations... that fact has already been established...
 "nothing to do with the regulations" is an extremist position.  Here's a nuanced & detailed take: "deregulation championed by then-President Donald Trump in 2018. While the law did reduce oversight of small and midsize banks, experts are divided over whether deregulation in 2018 ultimately caused Signature and Silicon Valley Bank to collapse."  --  factcheck.org, "What to Know About Trump-Era Bank Deregulation and Bank Failures "
seems like the bank issues are being resolved. Why the fear?
Tyler, lack of enforcement by government regulators created this mess....
  Hedging interest rate risk, for one.
  The "safest assets" of Treasury bonds they brought have been safe in that there's no default.  But no default doesn't mean the bonds can't fall in value as interest rate rises.
Enforcement weakened by Trump's de-regulation.
“…willingness on the part of the government to allow very large players to help stabilize the situation.” This demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of the banking sector; as long as government is seen as “the boss” we will continue to experience banking problems. Free markets not only work, they represent free people rightfully trading their own values, government’s role would be to protect those rights, not “allow” people to trade them.
Bank bailouts is good news for markets, what am I missing?
I sense sarcasm in Gary's post, whether intended or not.
bailout was a good thing as an emergency response. the real issue here is that banks are collapsing
You're missing a correct premise.   FRC was not bailed out.
powell is responsible for 3 bank collapse
Not Powell, US voters…they’ve been viting in the authorities that make Powell possible. If you want change, vote differently.
@Kim, ever heard of the fed's Dual mandate? I guess not.
US bank de-regulation happened under Trump and was not supported by Powell.
3rd bank collapse in one month and dow moving to all time high. jpm even know it's not good deal. wow
Boost from JPM...they just 'bailed out' another failing bank. The spin on news is bordering insainty
one more bank collapse and what will happen now. . big trouble us economy
US banks fail frequently, several a year.  One more is not remarkable.
second largest bank collapse in history, is not remarkable?🤣🤣
  Learn to read.  Kumar said "one more".  He wasn't talking about FRC.
ALL banks make up the Fed. Jo Morgan just happens to be a Fed's pet. Politicians do not control the Fed. The Rothschild, Morgans er al do. Money controls money. Just wait till the commercial real state hits bottom and see who takes all the chips home.
JP Morgan is the fed. The buyer of last resort.
There was an auction w/ multiple bidders.  If JPM isn't buying FRC, another bank would be.
Team Biden including Yellen ignore law that caps a single bank with over 10% of US deposits from buying new deposits. Lawless Democrats again.
For everyone else other than Brad, the correct citation is H.R. 4174 section 622, which amended 12 USC 1841.
H.R. 4174 is the The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act (or OPEN Government Data Act of 2018, which makes Stepthen wrong.  H.R. 3841 is the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 which amends the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, which makes Brad correct.
  H.R. 3841
jpm jumped. buying a defunct asset. we live in a matrix.
Yellen gave Jamie a steal of a deal.
it's joke. it going to damage jpm big
all joke. stock getting high for buying frc assets. wow
Muted??...honestly!.2nd largest bank failure in history and US Recession Probability Reaches 67%. Is this some sort of a sick rigged joke?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.