Get 40% Off
💰 Warren Buffett reveals a $6.72 billion stake in ChubbCopy Portfolios

Events leading up to the seizure of 4,000 beagles at Envigo facility

Published 03/09/2023, 06:23 AM
Updated 03/09/2023, 09:36 AM
© Reuters.

By Sarah N. Lynch and Rachael Levy

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Justice subpoenaed two of the top animal welfare officials at the Department of Agriculture to ask why they did not take action against animal research breeder Envigo despite documenting its mistreatment of thousands of beagles.

Here is a timeline of the USDA’s inspections of Envigo before the Justice Department searched and seized more than 4,000 beagles in May 2022.

The timeline is based on public inspection reports and more than 800 pages of newly released internal USDA records obtained by the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

July 20-22, 2021 - The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) inspects the Envigo beagle facility and finds 18 violations, 10 of which are “direct" or "critical," with direct indicating an animal is facing immediate harm.

Sept. 30, 2021 - Inspector Rachel Perez-Baum asks to increase staffing and send four or five inspectors for a planned October inspection due to problems such as "uncooperative facility management." Her supervisor Dana Miller concurs and urges APHIS to send inspectors in pairs after Envigo's staff “attempted to recant” their statements. Perez-Baum and Miller declined to comment to Reuters.

Oct. 7, 2021 - APHIS director Robert Gibbens declines the request, citing “optics” and the risks of COVID-19 exposure. Gibbens declined to comment to Reuters.

Oct. 25, 2021 – Three APHIS inspectors find 13 violations at Envigo, seven of which are “direct" or "critical."

Nov. 16-19, 2021 - APHIS inspects Envigo and finds 26 violations, 14 of which are "direct" or "critical."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Dec. 16-20 2021 - Envigo's Nov. 23 appeal of the October inspection sparks tension within APHIS, after Miller learns APHIS managers plan to strip some citations from the inspection report, including one that found Envigo provided false information. Miller claims APHIS has violated policy by not properly consulting her or Perez-Baum. Gibbens disagrees, saying the appeal review team is only permitted to consult them on "a question of fact," “to ensure impartiality” of the appeal.

Dec. 17, 2021 - Inspector Perez-Baum completes a 107-page report detailing what APHIS found in the November Envigo inspection. APHIS managers rescind it and order the inspection team to cut it to 22 pages. The move prompts several internal complaints to the USDA inspector general.

Feb. 16, 2022 - Miller informs her staff that Goldentyer has removed her from working on any more Envigo inspections. Miller offers no explanation. Goldentyer declined to comment to Reuters.

March 2-7, 2022 - Ahead of a planned inspection, inspectors learn that Gibbens met with Inotiv officials and promised that inspectors would conclude their inspections by 4 p.m. each day. Inspectors express concern that this will make it more difficult for them to do thorough inspections. APHIS leaders also narrow the scope of the upcoming inspection.

March 8, 2022 - APHIS employees inspect Envigo and find five violations, two of which are “direct.”

May 3, 2022 - APHIS inspects Envigo and only cite the company for failing to fix the dangerous flooring.

May 18, 2022 - Federal and state law enforcement agents execute a search warrant at Envigo and find 446 dogs in “acute distress.”

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

Sick. This practice should be banned.
Just more corrupt bureaucracy. Same old same old.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.