Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolio

Berkshire's Johns Manville unit to face revived antitrust lawsuit

Published 08/21/2023, 03:27 PM
Updated 08/21/2023, 03:30 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Berkshire Hathaway logo is displayed on a screen on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., May 10, 2023.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
BRKa
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday revived an antitrust lawsuit accusing Johns Manville, a unit of billionaire Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRKa), of monopolizing the market for calcium silicate, a substance used in thermal pipe insulation.

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver said a trial judge in that city erred in dismissing the lawsuit by rival Chase Manufacturing, also known as Thermal Pipe Shields (TPS).

TPS entered the calcium silicate market in 2018, with a product imported from China that it claimed was better and cost 20% to 25% less.

It accused Johns Manville of threatening to stop doing business with distributors if they bought TPS' calcium silicate, and that the threats enabled Johns Manville to still command 97.3% of the market by August 2021.

Writing for a three-judge appeals court panel, Circuit Judge Gregory Phillips found sufficient evidence that Johns Manville coerced distributors as it exercised monopoly power.

He cited testimony that Johns Manville enjoyed much higher gross margins on calcium silicate than on other products where it faced more competition.

Phillips also cited an email just after TPS entered the market, in which Johns Manville told sales staff they might need to "bring the sword" and warn distributors that their relationship might change "significantly" if they bought TPS' product.

"Viewing the evidence most favorably to TPS, we see JM as leaving its distributors with an all-or-nothing choice: stop doing business with TPS or lose access to JM's enormous thermal-insulation inventory," Phillips wrote.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The appeals court also upheld the dismissal of a claim that Johns Manville might have tied sales of other products to distributors agreeing not to buy TPS' calcium silicate.

TPS had sought at least $60 million in damages.

"We are carefully reviewing the opinion and considering our next steps," Johns Manville spokesman Eric Brown said in an email.

Luke Hasskamp, a lawyer for TPS, declined to comment.

Berkshire owns dozens of businesses including the BNSF railroad and Geico car insurance, and stocks such as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). It bought Johns Manville for about $1.8 billion in 2001.

The case is Chase Manufacturing Inc v Johns Manville Corp, 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-1164.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.