Sign up to create alerts for Instruments,
Economic Events and content by followed authors
Free Sign Up Already have an account? Sign In
Quotes
All Instrument Types
- All Instrument Types
- Indices
- Equities
- ETFs
- Funds
- Commodities
- Currencies
- Crypto
- Bonds
- Certificates
Please try another search
💎 Reveal Undervalued Stocks Hiding in Any Market Get Started
Activist investor Cevian urges inclusion of ESG targets in pay plans
© Reuters.
By Thyagaraju Adinarayan
LONDON (Reuters) - Swedish activist investor Cevian Capital on Wednesday urged all European companies to include environmental, social, and governance (ESG) targets in their management pay plans.
Amid growing public and political concerns about climate change and economic inequality, companies are under increasing pressure to show they are taking greater responsibility for how they generate their profits.
While more are making a general push on ESG improvements, for example by setting emission-reduction targets, Cevian said many were "box checking", and few had a proper link between performance on ESG issues and executive pay.
"Only a tiny share of companies meaningfully incorporate ESG targets into their incentive plans," said Christer Gardell, managing partner at Cevian Capital.
"To get away from ESG box checking and ensure that ESG considerations are truly embedded in corporate strategies, we need to incentivise management teams to embrace them."
The push on pay comes as part of a broader drive by investors globally to get companies to do more on environmental and social issues, with some of the biggest pledging to get tougher on company boards in the current AGM season.
Cevian, which counts ABB, Ericsson (BS:ERICAs) and Thyssenkrupp (DE:TKAG) among its top holdings, asked companies to develop proposals to incorporate ESG targets into incentive plans in time for their annual general meetings (AGMs) in 2022.
AGMs are key dates for companies, when directors seek shareholders’ blessing for pay packages, board line-ups and other matters.
Cevian said if its talks with companies failed to get the right response, it could vote against the re-election of directors, oppose their pay plans and back shareholder resolutions on the issue.
Related Articles
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
Report this comment
I feel that this comment is:
Comment flagged
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.