Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Blinken defends Afghan withdrawal at testy U.S. congressional hearing

Published 09/13/2021, 08:16 AM
Updated 09/13/2021, 11:42 PM
© Reuters. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken gives remarks during a 9/11 commemoration event to mark the 20th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, at the State Department in Washington, U.S., September 10, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Pool

By Patricia Zengerle and Humeyra Pamuk

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Secretary of State Antony Blinken beat back criticism of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan on Monday at a contentious congressional hearing where at least two Republicans called on him to resign.

In five hours of often testy exchanges with lawmakers, Blinken defended President Joe Biden's decision to pull out and pushed back on accusations that the State Department should have done more to help Americans and at-risk Afghans to be evacuated, blaming the previous administration for lacking a plan.

He repeatedly noted that Republican former President Donald Trump had negotiated the withdrawal agreement with the Taliban, and said Biden's administration could not renegotiate because of threats from the group to resume killing Americans.

"There's no evidence that staying longer would have made the Afghan security forces or the Afghan government any more resilient or self-sustaining," Blinken said.

"We inherited a deadline. We did not inherit a plan," Blinken said, referring to the Trump administration's agreement to remove all U.S. forces from Afghanistan by May 1.

Members of Congress - Biden's Democrats as well as opposition Republicans - have pledged to investigate since the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan last month after a rapid advance.

Blinken appeared on Monday before the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee and was to testify on Tuesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the first Biden administration official to testify publicly to lawmakers since the Islamist militant group's takeover.

Fireworks had been expected, given the amount of finger-pointing over how the two-decade-long war ended. Many Republicans, particularly those closely allied to Trump, interrupted or even shouted over Blinken during the House hearing, a departure for a committee known for bipartisan cooperation.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Others offered harsh criticism.

"The American people don't like to lose, especially not to the terrorists. But this is exactly what has happened," said Representative Michael McCaul, the panel's top Republican.

McCaul asked why assets like the Bagram Air Base were not maintained and why the administration had not reached counterterrorism agreements with neighboring countries.

"This is a national security threat as China moves in. For all I know they make take over Bagram," McCaul said.

Blinken said the United States was actively working to identify threats.

MANY QUESTIONS

Lawmakers asked a long list of questions about the rapid collapse of the U.S.-backed Afghan government and scramble to evacuate 124,000 people.

Democrats expressed concern about Americans and at-risk Afghans who still wish to leave, but backed the withdrawal as necessary, if painful. "I would welcome hearing what exactly a smooth withdrawal from a messy chaotic 20-year war looks like," said Representative Gregory Meeks, the committee's chairman.

Blinken praised the evacuation as "a heroic effort." He pledged that the United States will continue to support humanitarian aid to Afghanistan, but through non-governmental organizations and U.N. agencies, not the Taliban.

Afghanistan is at risk of running out of food as it faces a terrible drought in addition to political upheaval. "We need to do everything we can to make sure the people of Afghanistan don't suffer any more than is already the case," Blinken said.

He said he had not spoken personally to members of the Taliban leadership. "Any legitimacy that they may seek from the international community ... is going to be contingent on their actions," he said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Blinken said he would name a senior State Department official to focus on support for Afghan women, girls and minorities.

Republicans grilled Blinken about what happened at Kabul's airport during the evacuation ahead of the administration's Aug. 31 deadline to leave. Thirteen U.S. troops and dozens of Afghans were killed in a suicide bombing amid the chaos.

Democrats said they wanted to address not just the seven months Biden was president before Kabul fell but all 20 years of U.S. involvement in the country - under presidents from both parties.

A U.S.-led invasion toppled the Taliban in 2001 after the Sept. 11 attacks masterminded by al Qaeda leaders based in Afghanistan.

Latest comments

load of bs and superficial talk
"Republican former President Donald Trump had negotiated the withdrawal agreement with the Taliban"  & "There's no evidence that staying longer would have made the Afghan security forces or the Afghan government any more resilient or self-sustaining,"  - are you disputing these two statements?
Unqualify for the job is Blinking all the time
 yes, no one in the Biden admin is as qualified as President Orange in negotiating such an awesome deal with the Taliban and training the Afgan Army, Art of the Deal indeed
Lol..."we inherited a plan" What a pike of BS. To think the USA cowered under an agreement with the Taliban is beyond amazing to me. I thought Biden stood up to cornpop?
It was Trumps plan, negotiated with Taliban. Republicans love the Taliban else why would they negotiate a deal
Why couldnt they adjust it?
the tasty questions were asked about his smmons to meet fbi regarding bidens son laptop and biden ongoing family corruption. caught binken and dems flat footed
That was awesome. Wish he cracked
this was as if the Captain of the Titanic told the crew to abandon ship before the passengers.
The story of Italian Concordia ferry...
A total disaster!
The main problem is why didn’t Biden wait US citizens and Afghan partners run before withdrawal Army
Funny how tracing who is at fault alway ends up at democrats.
I think that may show your bias. But don't think too much about it, just keep spewing your knowledge.
Why would anyone with a brain still defend this weak cowardly president and his inept administration
 no one here is defending Trump, even the Trumpsters are pretending Trump had nothing to do with the Taliban peace deal
Biden administration can never admit their errors sign of bad leadership. Biden did not have to leave billions in weapons for the Taliban that was a choice of bad leadership.
Ronald Reagan started arming the Afgans 40 years ago......you don't think some of those weapons ended up in Talibans' hands?  Nah, can't be, republican presidents would never do anything silly like that........
You are biased. Biden pullout of Afghanistan was bad. You cannot say it was Trump plan because Biden admin could have changed it just a lazy excuse.
 "Biden pullout of Afghanistan was bad. You cannot say it was Trump plan"  -- the treaty Pompeo negotiated and Trump signed (without Afgan govt consent) specifically stated that US and Allied troops will have to withdraw within 14 months of the signing and release of 5000 taliban prisoners......funny now all of the sudden that's not Trump's plan, yeah OK
I think it's shameful how our manipulation and military *****of other countries doesn't work out the way our super rich want. Maybe we should copy Russia and China. They seem to be better at it.
its D o m - in nation
Silly comment.
I'm glad you were able to figure that out. Was it that obvious though?
Hail USA
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.