⌛ Did you miss ProPicks’ 13% gains in May? Subscribe now & catch June’s top AI-picked stocks early.Unlock Stocks

U.S. judge keeps $100 mln Bratz ruling for Mattel

Published 04/28/2009, 01:19 PM
Updated 04/28/2009, 01:24 PM
MAT
-

CHICAGO, April 28 (Reuters) - A federal judge has refused to reduce the $100 million award a jury granted to Mattel Inc in the toymaker's lawsuit against MGA Entertainment over the popular Bratz dolls.

U.S. District Judge Stephen Larson also barred MGA from making or selling the dolls by lifting a stay on his previous order. He also appointed a temporary receiver to oversee the Bratz business in an order issued on Monday.

Mattel, the world's largest toymaker, known for its iconic Barbie doll, won the rights to the $1 billion-plus Bratz franchise last year in a lawsuit against MGA and former Mattel Barbie designer Carter Bryant.

Bryant invented the Bratz concept while under contract to Mattel. A jury ruled that Bryant had secretly sold the concept to MGA.

MGA had argued that the jury's monetary award of $100 million to Mattel actually was comprised of duplicate awards that should not be combined.

Larson dismissed that theory of the jury's intentions as "purely speculative."

"The jury's verdict of $100 million is well within the range of possible awards based on the evidence of record, and therefore the Court must leave it undisturbed," Larson wrote in the ruling.

Larson also ordered MGA to file a full accounting of all profits that have resulted from all sales of Bratz products covered by the lawsuit occurring after Aug. 26, 2008.

Last week, MGA CEO Isaac Larian said his company had proposed that Mattel pay MGA "way below $500 million" to settle the legal battle and let Mattel have the whole Bratz line.

That followed a comment by Mattel CEO Robert Eckert that he had not seen anything that led him to believe that MGA wanted to resolve the issue.

Shares of Mattel were up 2 percent at $14.97 early Tuesday afternoon.

The case, Mattel Inc v. MGA Entertainment Inc, et al, 04-09049, in U.S. District Court in Riverside, California. (Reporting by Brad Dorfman; Editing by Richard Chang)

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.