Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolio

Zelenskiy appeals to U.S. Republican critics as war with Russia rages

Published 12/21/2022, 02:48 PM
Updated 12/21/2022, 09:40 PM
© Reuters. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy meets with U.S. President Joe Biden (not pictured) in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, U.S., December 21, 2022. REUTERS/Leah Millis

By Patricia Zengerle and Gram Slattery

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy faced a critical audience when he addressed a joint session of the U.S. Congress on Wednesday: House Republicans who could hold up billions of dollars in war aid starting next month.

President Joe Biden's administration has sent almost $50 billion in foreign assistance to Ukraine since Russia began its invasion of its neighbor in February, including humanitarian, financial and military support. Congress, currently controlled by Biden's Democrats, is expected to approve $44.9 billion more this week in a bill funding the federal government.

It remains to be seen whether congressional support for Ukraine will change after Republicans take control of the House of Representatives next month. Biden's fellow Democrats retained control of the Senate in the November midterm elections.

Zelenskiy stressed as he began his speech that he was addressing both Democrats and Republicans.

He told a House chamber jammed with hundreds of lawmakers that Ukraine's fight was for the greater good, and he thanked all Americans for their assistance so far.

"Your money is not charity. It is an investment in the global security and democracy," Zelenskiy said.

Nonetheless, the funding stream could slow starting on Jan. 3, when Republicans take a narrow majority in the House of Representatives. Some hardline members of the Republican caucus have called for an end to the aid that has helped Ukraine fight Russian forces, instead calling for an audit to trace how the money previously allocated has been spent.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

All 57 House votes against a bill providing more than $40 billion for Ukraine in May came from Republicans.

"No more blank checks to Ukraine," Republican Representative Andy Biggs wrote on Twitter hours before Zelenskiy's visit to Washington. Biggs, a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, has emerged as the main challenger to House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy in the House speakership election, slated for Jan. 3.

A few of the most hardline Republicans - including representatives Lauren Boebert and Matt Gaetz - remained seated during the standing ovations, sitting and staring at their phones as Zelenskiy spoke.

Both told reporters after the speech that they would not support more aid for Kyiv. Gaetz said nothing had changed his opposition to Ukraine aid and, when asked if there was anything compelling in the speech, said, "I loved the fashion choices."

But many Republicans said assistance to Ukraine must continue, although with more oversight.

"The majority of both parties in the House and Senate support this effort. But they're not going to if we don't have accountability and transparency," Representative Michael McCaul, the Republican in line to chair the House Foreign Affairs Committee in January, told reporters.

PARTY DIVISIONS

The early weeks of 2023 could feature a leadership battle in the House, during which time legislating would likely grind to a halt. And even when the Republican-led House agrees on its leader, deep divisions between it, Biden and the Democratic-led Senate, could make it hard for lawmakers to agree on new initiatives.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

While they are unlikely to stop aid altogether, Republicans could slow or pare back the assistance, or use it as leverage to win concessions from Democrats on Republican priorities like clamping down on immigration across the southern border with Mexico.

McCarthy said in October that Ukraine would no longer receive a "blank check" from the United States.

Funding for Ukraine puts historic priorities of the Republican party at odds: a strong defense and opposition to Russia versus a desire to rein in government spending. Adding to the complexity is the allegiance of many in the party to former President Donald Trump's "America First" policies.

Some of his allies in Congress have viewed Ukraine's government as corrupt since Trump's first impeachment trial.

House Democrats voted to impeach Trump in 2019 on charges he held up military aid for Ukraine to put pressure on Zelenskiy to investigate one of Biden's sons. The issue could loom large again as Trump seeks the Republican presidential nomination in 2024.

Latest comments

Zelensky is a con man. Almost as destructive as climate loons.
I want every dollar we've given them back. No more to Ukraine, ever.
russian troll alert
Agreed !!
Why?
What is it you don't understand here? America gets to defeat its no. one enemy for pennies on the dollar, risking no or few American lives. By comparison Republican president George W's botched war of terror cost 21 trillion dollars and couldn't even defeat a bunch of sheep farming religious freaks in Afghanistan...
Jon Gr Very clearly stated by Zelensky, Russia must withdraw from all of Ukraine... A defeat in Ukraine means a stop to putins imperial ambitions in Europe
re. russias animosity, with putin threatening nuclear holocaust he is effectively threatening life on earth, thus an enemy not only to America but to the world
wishful thinking if you think this ends with Russia leaving without any Ukranian territory. Crimea at the very least will be fought over for the next hundred years.
As an American, I don't want to pay for the allure of global security and democracy, I want to start paying for America's debts so American children can have a better future. Europe can pay for its security.
anyone with compassion, humanity, and a moral compass sympathises with and supports Zelensky and Ukraine 🇺🇦
Oh, the relative moralism of the left's echo chamber.
I'd really like to see you post something someday that articulates some kind of principle instead of just scolding people for having values and morals. Do you stand for anything other than mere opposition to liberty and democracy. One might assume you are a fascist, but you don't seem to have the courage to come right out and say so.
 "If wishes were horses..." I'm obviously not an actual American fascist. You holding the concept of "liberty" up as a shared value reinforces my point on liberal's relative moralism.
These handful of Republican dead enders in the House have long records of being on the wrong side of history. So it will be again with the ineffectual opinions on Ukraine.
Ukraine is not in America's important national security interests. Let Europe pay for it.
The last time people were of the opinion that military imperialism in Europe was not in America's interest, it lead to near catastrophe. Yours is an opinion ignorant of history and blind to the real US interest in the sovereignty of democracies in Europe.
 What was America's debt to GDP ration "the last time" compared to today's?  How well generally was bipartisan collaboration working in DC during "the last time" compared to today? Times have changed boomer.
No more money to launder for rhose Demorats!
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.