Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Reuters poll: Fed's core PCE inflation concern threshold is 2.8% - economists

EconomyMay 13, 2021 11:06PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Shoppers carry bags of purchased merchandise at the King of Prussia Mall, United States' largest retail shopping space, in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, U.S., December 8, 2018. REUTERS/Mark Makela/File Photo

By Shrutee Sarkar

BENGALURU (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge would have to hit a high of 2.8% to discomfort U.S. policymakers, according to a Reuters poll which also suggested the central bank would tolerate that rate for three months at least before it acts.

Stocks slumped and Treasury yields jumped on Wednesday after data showed annual U.S. consumer prices unexpectedly rose by the most in nearly 12 years in April, prompting earlier policy tightening bets.

In the 12 months through March, the core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index - the Fed's preferred inflation measure for its 2% average flexible target - increased 1.8%, the most since February 2020.

That inflation gauge would have to rise as high as 2.8% to cause discomfort at the Fed, according to the median of 41 economists in response to an additional question in the May 10-13 poll. While forecasts ranged from 2.3% to a high of 4.0%, the most common response, or the mode, was 2.5%.

James Knightley, chief international economist at ING, said, "I have put 2.8%, but to be honest anything above 2.5%. However, it is more about how sustainable it looks rather than a specific monthly figure and has to be viewed in the context of what is happening to growth and jobs."

"If we have core PCE above 2.5% in early 2022 as well, we will seriously have to consider an accelerated QE tapering with a rate hike before the end of the year," he added.

(Graphic: Reuters poll graphic on the U.S. inflation outlook -

When asked how long the Fed would tolerate that high rate of core PCE inflation before it acts, 36 of 41 economists said three months at least.

A breakdown showed five economists expected a less than 3-month threshold, while 12 economists predicted 3-6 months, seven said 6-9 months, nine penciled in 9-12 months and eight forecast over 12 months.

The poll consensus showed the core PCE price index would ease and average between 2.0% and 2.2% from next quarter through to end-2022 after hitting 2.4% this quarter. Those views were largely unchanged from April.

Only four economists penciled in that inflation measure at or above 2.8% - the expected discomfort rate for policymakers - in any quarter in the forecast horizon, confounding financial markets' fears of higher price pressures.

"The Fed will likely continue to be dismissive of strength led by transitory price increases, but data over the coming months will be important for gauging the persistence of strong price increases," noted Veronica Clark, economist at Citi.

"However, as April data releases so far have highlighted, there is substantial uncertainty around the path of inflation, and all economic data, in coming months."

Driven by strengthening demand after reopening from the coronavirus-led curbs and massive fiscal spending, the U.S. economy was forecast to expand on average 6.5% this year and 4.1% next, up from 6.2% and 4.0%, respectively, predicted previously.

But jobs growth was expected to lag and take longer to sufficiently heal.

Asked when the U.S. unemployment rate would reach its pre-crisis levels, a majority of economists, or 35 of 50, said it would take over a year, including 15 predicting more than two years.

Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida said on Wednesday last week's weak employment report makes the pace of the jobs recovery "more uncertain", adding the twin surprises of weak jobs data and stronger inflation in April hadn't dented current plans.

"We don't expect any action on the funds rate until 2024...Tapering is a different story; they just need substantial progress, not mission accomplished," said Jim O'Sullivan, chief U.S. macro strategist at TD Securities.

(Graphic: Reuters poll graphic on U.S. unemployment rate and monetary policy outlook -

Asked when the Fed would start scaling back its $120 billion monthly asset purchases, a majority of economists, or 31 of 51, said in the first quarter of 2022, while 13 respondents said in Q4 this year.

"The Fed is not going to panic after one startling CPI report, so you can expect to hear even more about transitory bottleneck inflation pressures over the next few weeks," said Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics.

"But this report does mean that the first part of the higher inflation story - the reopening spike - is real. It's no longer a forecast, and further hefty increases are coming...we continue to look for tapering at the end of this year."

(For other stories from the Reuters global long-term economic outlook polls package:)

Reuters poll: Fed's core PCE inflation concern threshold is 2.8% - economists

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
nssskk nath
nssskk nath May 13, 2021 9:48PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The present high inflation rate is only transitory. Once, every thing opens and production starts picking up, there will be clear reduction in inflation rates in the next few months compared to the present high figure. Reasonable inflation implies growth, which is very much required and FED will always tolerate reasonable increase in inflation rate and we can see the same in the months to come. FED tapering and hiking of interest rates will not happen earlier than their regular plan. So, no worries regarding interest rates and tapering upto 2023/2024.
Me comment
Me comment May 13, 2021 9:31PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I would believe these expert economists on anything the say. they can't get predictions for job growth, new unemployment claims, GDP growth or anything else right. So why should we believe they know what PCE level the FED would be comfortable with. They will just claim it unexpectedly didn't happen the way they said it should. LOL!
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email