🔮 Better than the Oracle? Our Fair Value found this +42% bagger 5 months before Buffett bought itRead More

US senators seek salary info from Fed's inspector general

Published 07/25/2023, 06:12 AM
Updated 07/25/2023, 03:36 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questions witnesses during a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing in the wake of recent bank failures, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 18, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/Fil
SBNY
-

By David Morgan and Costas Pitas

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Republican U.S. Senator Rick Scott and Democrat Elizabeth Warren have asked for salary information from the Federal Reserve's inspector general, the central bank's watchdog, in a push to make the role independent, a letter seen by Reuters on Tuesday shows.

The IG's office said it was reviewing the letter and declined further comment.

Republicans and Democrats in Congress have pledged tighter oversight of banking regulators following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank (OTC:SBNY) in March.

The Fed is responsible for supervising - monitoring, inspecting and examining - certain financial institutions to ensure compliance with rules and regulations, and safe and sound operations.

Some in Congress worry that Fed Inspector General Mark Bialek's role is not independent enough, because he reports directly to the Fed board.

Under the senators' plans, the IG would be appointed by the U.S. president and confirmed by the Senate.

Among their concerns, the senators wrote in the letter, is that the IG's compensation structure could result in potential conflicts of interest. His salary is tied to the compensation of Fed officials he is tasked with investigating.

"... Because the Fed Inspector General's salary is in part based on the bonuses earned by other Fed employees ... there is a structural, financial incentive for the IG to overlook or downplay wrongdoing by those Fed officials," Warren and Scott wrote in a letter to Bialek dated July 24, citing his previous testimony.

"These types of conflicts are why we have introduced legislation ...."

The letter detailed five questions, including what salary Bialek had received over the last five full calendar years, what percentage of his salary was based on the average bonus component of the pay formula, and whether he had conducted any inspections in connection with Fed bonuses in the last five years.

Bialek has faced criticism from Warren and other lawmakers for his handling of the securities trading scandal that caused two regional Fed bank presidents to step down in the fall of 2021.

At a hearing in May 2023, Warren blasted him for failing to produce a report on a matter that tarred the Fed's reputation when it was reported nearly two years ago.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questions witnesses during a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing in the wake of recent bank failures, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 18, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo

Bialek defended his agency's independence and ability to conduct investigations.

"No Board Chair has resisted or objected to our oversight work since I have been the IG," he said at the time.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.