Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Last Call for Cyber Monday! Save Now on Claim 60% OFF

U.S. judge leaves CDC COVID-19 eviction moratorium in place

Published Aug 13, 2021 11:49AM ET Updated Aug 13, 2021 03:42PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A sleeping bag is seen on the chair of U.S. Representative Cori Bush (D-MO) who spent the night on the steps of the U.S. Capitol to highlight the upcoming expiration of the pandemic-related federal moratorium on residential evictions, in Washi 2/2

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Friday rejected a bid to block a residential eviction moratorium put in place last week by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), despite raising questions about the new order's legality.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich on procedural grounds is a win for the Biden administration. She said the realtor groups that sued must go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to challenge the new 60-day CDC moratorium set to expire on Oct. 3.

The National Association of Realtors, which is supporting realtor groups in Alabama and Georgia that are among those challenging the moratorium, said in a statement the groups "now plan to return in short order to the D.C. Circuit Court and then again to the Supreme Court if necessary."

The group added it is "confident in our position that this unlawful eviction ban will soon come to an end."

White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement the administration was "pleased that the district court left the moratorium in place, though we are aware that further proceedings in this case are likely."

The administration said it continues to urge state and local governments to quickly distribute $46.5 billion in emergency rental assistance funds approved by Congress.

Under heavy political pressure, the CDC reversed course on Aug. 3 and issued a slightly narrower eviction moratorium just three days after the prior one expired. The current moratorium covers nearly 92% of U.S. counties, but that could change based on COVID-19 conditions.

More than 15 million people in 6.5 million U.S. households are currently behind on rental payments, according to a study, and collectively owe more than $20 billion to landlords.

Friedrich in May declared the CDC eviction moratorium, which was first issued in September 2020, unlawful but delayed her ruling from immediately taking effect.

In June, a divided Supreme Court agreed to let the CDC moratorium remain in effect after the agency announced it would allow the ban to expire on July 31.

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued a concurring opinion saying that in his view extending the CDC moratorium past July 31 would need "clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation)."

Before that, the appeals court had issued a ruling upholding a decision to put Friedrich's ruling on hold.

Landlord groups argued Kavanaugh's ruling meant Friedrich should immediately block the new moratorium.

Friedrich said she would have blocked the eviction order but for the appeals court ruling.

"The court’s hands are tied. The Supreme Court did not issue a controlling opinion in this case, and circuit precedent provides that the votes of dissenting justices may not be combined with that of a concurring justice to create binding law," she wrote.

The CDC declined to comment on Friday.

U.S. judge leaves CDC COVID-19 eviction moratorium in place
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (3)
Me comment
Me comment Aug 13, 2021 2:01PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The court justice is following the rule of law as the supreme court allowed the prior eviction ban to continue. A minority justices opinion is just that an opinion not law. If it was law it would negate every majority verdict ever done, when a minority opinion wad made.
YouTube Account
YouTube Account Aug 13, 2021 11:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
RIP Rule of Law in the US.
Craig Holbrook
Craig Holbrook Aug 13, 2021 11:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You're going to end up paying for this, my friend.  And me too!
Bobby Hall
Bobby Hall Aug 13, 2021 11:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Who days were are not flirting with communism in the U.S.?
Bobby Hall
Bobby Hall Aug 13, 2021 11:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
says, not days.
YouTube Account
YouTube Account Aug 13, 2021 11:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
"flirting" - dude, communism is pregnant in the US and Uncle Sam is DEFINITELY the father.
John Snowden
John Snowden Aug 13, 2021 11:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
i guess its easy to see how amazing the lives of russian oligarchs are and chinese officials... so the same psychotic, power and money hungry types in the US want it.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email