Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Trump says he had to 'take China on,' regardless of short-term impact on U.S. economy

Published 08/21/2019, 04:31 AM
© Reuters. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Air Force One to return to Washington from Morristown Municipal Airport in Morristown, New Jersey

By Humeyra Pamuk and Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he had to confront China over trade even if it caused short-term harm to the U.S. economy because Beijing had been cheating Washington for decades.

Trump's strongly worded comments came hours before his government announced approval of an $8 billion sale of Lockheed Martin (N:LMT) F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan, a move sure to draw Beijing's ire and further dim prospects for a quick trade deal.

On Monday, Vice President Mike Pence had also poked China on another sensitive topic, Hong Kong, calling on Beijing to respect the integrity of the former British colony's laws in its response to mass protests there.

"Somebody had to take China on," Trump told reporters during a White House visit by Romanian President Klaus Iohannis, when asked about wide-ranging tariffs he has imposed on imports from China. "This is something that had to be done. The only difference is I am doing it," he said.

"China has been ripping this country off for 25 years, for longer than that and it's about time whether it's good for our country or bad for our country short term. Long term it's imperative that somebody does this," he said.

China's Foreign Ministry appeared to downplay the comments.

"That the two sides have differences in issues of trade and the economy is not something to be scared of. The key is to resolve the issues through dialogue," ministry spokesman Geng Shuang told reporters in Beijing on Wednesday.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Trump's tariffs and threats of more to come have roiled global markets and unnerved investors as the trade dispute between the world's two largest economies stretches into its second year with no end in sight.

Growing concerns that the trade war could trigger a possible U.S. recession weighed on financial markets last week and seemed to put administration officials on edge about whether the economy would hold up through the November 2020 presidential election.

Democrats on Sunday argued Trump's trade policies were posing an acute, short-term risk. U.S. stock markets slumped last week on recession fears with all three major U.S. indexes closing down about 3% on Wednesday, although they pared their losses by Friday.

Trump, who is seeking re-election, again dismissed such fears, saying: "We're far from recession."

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told CNBC that U.S. and Chinese officials were expected to speak by telephone about the trade dispute over the next week to 10 days, followed by a possible face-to-face meeting.

But trade experts said the prospects for productive negotiations were clouded by Washington's increasingly combative stance against China, including the arms sale to Taiwan and its increasingly tough language on Hong Kong.

The Pentagon on Tuesday formally notified Congress that the U.S. State Department had approved the possible sale of 66 F-16 fighter jets to Taiwan, which Beijing considers a renegade province.

China, which has never renounced the use of force to bring the island under its control, has warned it could take unspecified "countermeasures" in response to the sale.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Under Washington's "one-China" policy, the U.S. government officially recognizes Beijing and not Taipei, while assisting Taiwan. It remains the main arms supplier to Taiwan.

In a separate development, the U.S. International Trade Commission said it had found that subsidized steel rack imports from China had materially harmed U.S. industry, locking in duties imposed by the U.S. Commerce Department on such products.

The Commerce Department last month said it had concluded that exporters from China had sold steel racks and parts at less than fair value, with total imports from China of such products amounting to about $200 million in 2017.

Latest comments

I think its good
he has to take China on, and the EU, Iran, Mexico, Canada, Danmark, and just about everyone else on the face of Earth.But not Russia
Everybody needs to keep in mind Trump is a habitual, pathological liar. Put that in the context, then we can have more meaningful discussion here.
You watch too much CNN
you have been cheating your voters for years
Why anyone believes what he says is beyond comprehension.
He's correct but when things get ugly the weak get gone..
Trump purposely took on not just China, but even allies. Trump wanted these trade wars & conflicts to drag on so he continue to manipulate the market & enrich himself. US economy & citizens, are just collateral damage. Trump is just playing to the sentiment of many Americans, manipulating emotion of the masses to benefit himself. After all since when does Trump cares about other than himself?
looks like Google translator isn't working for ya huh?
Best comment here.
*...so he can continue to manipulate...*
Only take away is the US-China trade war is all about creating political storms to prop up Trump himself so during his term he can say he did something no one ever done before, as most politicians came before him sacrificing Americans for their own political benefits.
I think we should have just pumped up Mexico and moved everything to Mexico. it will solve the China issue and the border problem
This is easy said then done. Only China has the infrastructure, the skills, and the people to do the production for high quality at a low cost.
move import from China to Vietnam and calling it a win because deficit with China is deficit but with Vietnam it is not. lol.
I feel bad for the farmers in all this but I remember watching my friends lose their homes, businesses towns practically dry up because of all the cheap products that flooded the us market some of these places never recovered. I don't blame China I blame our government and us for letting it happen
I agree and i empathize. I truly do. That is a horrible situation. But they wont be coming back and these promises made now by this administration are empty at best and just stand to hurt more Americans.
DJT is just playing on their pain and loss to get their vote. He knows they wont be getting jobs back that are long gone.
You need to blame who tried be friendly with China communism and rrsulted in this huge deficit US. - - - - Democratic party
what a HUGE disaster. . . . . some of these markets are lost forever now
So, DJT thinks hurting farmers and US taxpayers is irrelavant? Got it.
Yeah, what about for long-term, Mr President?
What he said and what is happening or two different things. He said US market is strong, while we are probably in a recession. He said US is winning the trade war, while many experts said US is losing. He said Hiawei is a national treath, but is willing to negotiate.
His only REAL problem with Huawei is that it's a tech giant that isn't American and it threatens Apple. National security my backside.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.