Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Trump feud with California warrants U.S. Congress probe: hundreds of ex-EPA employees

Published 10/10/2019, 01:54 PM
Updated 10/10/2019, 01:56 PM
Trump feud with California warrants U.S. Congress probe: hundreds of ex-EPA employees

By Timothy Gardner

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Hundreds of former U.S. Environmental Protection Agency employees on Thursday urged a congressional probe into whether the agency's feud with California represented retaliation for the state's failure to support President Donald Trump's political agenda.

Last month the Trump administration escalated its fight with California with a letter to Governor Gavin Newsom accusing the state of violating clean water laws by failing to properly prevent human waste from homeless people from entering waterways.

"No evidence supports targeting the homeless for Clean Water Act enforcement, given the much greater damage done by the huge volume of waste discharged from industrial plants, factory farms, and sewage treatment plants and many other sources,” wrote the former EPA employees, including Elizabeth Southerland, a former agency director of science and technology.

"Considering its enthusiasm for de-regulation and reluctance to enforce the laws still on the books, President Trump's threat to wield EPA's authority against the most vulnerable members of our society is shameless and morally repugnant,” they said.

The letter followed a call on Sept. 27 by U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, for the EPA's inspector general to probe whether politics instead of pollution was behind the Trump administration's threat to withhold more than $4 billion in federal transportation funding from California over claims of poor air quality.

The letter, signed by nearly 600 EPA former employees, to U.S. House of Representatives oversight and energy committees also came as a response to Trump's claim last month that homeless people are responsible for "tremendous" amounts of ocean pollution in California.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Spearheaded by the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project, the letter noted that six states have had more large pollution sources in noncompliance with federal environmental laws over the last three years than California: Ohio, New York, Iowa, Missouri, Texas and Indiana. The letter cited agency records.

California has waged numerous policy battles and legal challenges with the Republican president's administration over environmental protection, immigration, housing and the state's right to set stricter standards on carbon emissions from vehicles than federal rules.

Michael Abboud, an EPA spokesman, said there was no abuse of authority. "California's inability to comply with the Safe Drinking Water Act has been an ongoing challenge, and the failure to properly operate and maintain the City’s sewage collection and treatment facilities creates public health risks," he said.

"Highlighting that California has the worst air quality in the nation along with other serious environmental problems is not a political issue," Abboud added.

Latest comments

ok thanks
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.