Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Oath Keepers begin defense in trial over U.S. Capitol attack

Published 11/03/2022, 04:46 PM
Updated 11/03/2022, 04:56 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Oath Keepers militia founder Stewart Rhodes poses during an interview session in Eureka, Montana, U.S. June 20, 2016. Picture taken June 20, 2016.  REUTERS/Jim Urquhart/File Photo

By Chris Gallagher

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense lawyers on Thursday opened their case in the trial of Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes and four others over their alleged roles in the attack on the U.S. Capitol, arguing the defendants were in Washington to do security work and did not plot to stop the transfer of presidential power.

Rhodes and co-defendants Thomas Caldwell, Kenneth Harrelson, Kelly Meggs and Jessica Watkins are charged with multiple felonies in connection with the Capitol assault, including seditious conspiracy, which carries a sentence of up to 20 years in prison.

The first defense witness, Watkins’ fiancé Montana Siniff, testified that Watkins had had no intention to try to stop the election certification. Siniff was concerned when he saw that Watkins had entered the Capitol but said she was a “law-abiding citizen.”

“I never doubted her intentions but I thought it was a stupid idea,” he said.

Prosecutors, who rested their case on Thursday after more than a month, have said the defendants conspired to prevent Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden's election victory on Jan. 6, 2021, in a bid to keep Republican Donald Trump in power.

Some of the defendants were among the Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol building after the then-president falsely claimed the election had been stolen from him through widespread fraud.

Prosecutors presented evidence including text and audio communications among the defendants in the run-up to Jan. 6, and called witnesses including FBI agents and former members of the Oath Keepers.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Stanley Woodward (NASDAQ:WWD), an attorney for Meggs, said in an opening statement that he would present an alternative motive for Meggs' actions.

Woodward, as well as Harrelson's lawyer Bradford Geyer in a separate statement, described their clients as having long been involved in disaster relief and security and were motivated to get involved with the Oath Keepers due to worries about riots and protests in the United States in 2020.

Woodward said Meggs had provided security at events on previous occasions, including for Trump ally Roger Stone, at the request of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

The evidence would show Meggs had done security work in Washington at a pro-Trump rally in November 2020 and was invited by Stone himself to Washington for security work on Jan. 6, but did not plan to enter the Capitol or stop the election, Woodward said.

Rhodes, a Yale-educated attorney and former U.S. Army paratrooper, is expected to take the stand at some stage as the defense presents its case.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.