Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Lehman's Fuld defeats employee lawsuit over retirement losses

Published 07/10/2015, 06:17 PM
Updated 07/10/2015, 06:17 PM
© Reuters. Richard Fuld testifies before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission for a hearing about extraordinary government intervention and the recent financial crisis, on Capitol Hill in Washington

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit by former Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc employees seeking to hold onetime Chief Executive Richard Fuld liable for their retirement plan losses as the Wall Street bank plunged into its 2008 bankruptcy.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan rejected claims that Fuld breached an obligation to share what he knew about Lehman's fast-deteriorating finances with officials who oversaw the plan, where Lehman stock was an investment option.

The judge also rejected claims that those officials breached their fiduciary duty to employees by letting them invest in Lehman stock, resulting in millions of dollars of losses.

Investors said the officials ignored mounting public concern about Lehman's health, failed to explore whether hidden risks made the stock unsafe, and did not consider whether "special" circumstances, including a regulatory ban on short sales of large bank stocks, made the share price unreliable.

"The true objects of plaintiffs' ire may well be the Lehman executives whom plaintiffs allege made material misstatements regarding the financial health of the company to the detriment of participants in the securities markets," Kaplan wrote.

Nonetheless, he said the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act "is not the statutory mechanism to pursue such claims."

ERISA lawsuits over the inclusion of company stock in retirement plans are common after stock prices suffer large or surprise declines.

Kaplan previously dismissed two versions of the lawsuit, but revisited it after the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2014 lessened the defenses available to banks in similar cases, in a lawsuit involving Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB).

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Mark Rifkin, a lawyer for the Lehman employees, called the decision "disappointing" and said he anticipates an appeal.

Fuld's lawyer Todd Fishman did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Jonathan Youngwood, a partner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett representing the plan officials, said: "We're very pleased. I hope for my clients' sake that it is over."

Lehman filed for Chapter 11 protection on Sept. 15, 2008, helping precipitate that year's global financial crisis. Its bankruptcy remains the largest in U.S. history.

In a May 28 speech, Fuld broke years of public silence over Lehman's collapse, maintaining that "Lehman Brothers in 2008 was not a bankrupt company."

The case is In re Lehman ERISA Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 08-05598.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.