Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Florida fight over congressional maps goes back to court

Published 08/25/2015, 05:18 PM
Updated 08/25/2015, 05:18 PM
Florida fight over congressional maps goes back to court

By Bill Cotterell

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (Reuters) - Florida legislators, stymied in repeated efforts to draw congressional districts that meet a constitutional anti-gerrymandering rule, took their standoff before a circuit judge Tuesday.

Florida's congressional map was invalidated in July by the state Supreme Court, creating political uncertainty across much of Florida heading into the 2016 elections, when it is expected to be the largest swing state in the presidential race.

Republicans dominate Florida's congressional delegation by a 17 to 10 margin, as well as its legislature and statewide offices, but voters there twice helped to elect President Barack Obama.

   Florida's House asked Judge Terry Lewis to decide whether its version of redistricting complies with the state constitution better than a Senate plan. The state Senate, meanwhile, wants the courts to hold off while lawmakers try a third special session on remapping Florida's 27 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

At the five-minute hearing Lewis said he will ask the state Supreme Court if he should go ahead and draw the maps or let the Legislature try again. "I don't feel I have the authority to do anything," he said.

A two-week special session ended in a standoff last Friday when the House refused to extend it into this week.

Both chambers are controlled by Republicans, who Lewis ruled last year violated a 2010 "Fair Districts Florida" constitutional amendment forbidding any favoritism towards incumbents or either political party in drawing legislative and congressional districts.

   The Legislature had a special session last year to adjust two central Florida districts that Lewis rejected, but his ruling was appealed and the state Supreme Court ruled on July 9 that eight districts must be redrawn.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In this month's special session, the House approved a plan that was drawn by legislative staff attorneys – tailored to the Supreme Court ruling – while the Senate altered the lines in the Tampa Bay area.

Each side held out for its version of the congressional map as the session ended on Friday.

   House Speaker, Republican Steve Crisafulli, asked the Supreme Court on Monday to relinquish jurisdiction to Lewis for 60 days so he could examine the competing maps. Senate President, Republican Andy Gardiner, said he would prefer legislators to try again in another special session.

   Legislators already have another session scheduled for Oct. 19 to redraw state Senate districts. That would be a few days beyond the Supreme Court's deadline for Lewis to review the maps.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.