Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Judge orders U.S. to respond to CDC eviction ban challenge by Friday

Published 08/05/2021, 08:12 AM
Updated 08/05/2021, 07:06 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A "For Rent" sign is displayed in front of an apartment building in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., June 20, 2021. REUTERS/Will Dunham/File Photo

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. judge early on Thursday ordered the Biden administration to quickly respond to a legal challenge to a new eviction moratorium put in place by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich ordered the Justice Department to respond by 9 a.m. EDT (1300 GMT) on Friday. The Alabama Association of Realtors and others said in an emergency filing late on Wednesday that the CDC had issued the new order "for nakedly political reasons - to ease the political pressure, shift the blame to the courts for ending the moratorium, and use litigation delays to achieve a policy objective."

U.S. President Joe Biden told reporters on Thursday he believed the moratorium was legal and said he had not instructed CDC to issue the order. He said he could not guarantee the courts would not rule against the moratorium.

More than 15 million people in 6.5 million U.S. households are currently behind on rental payments, according to a study by the Aspen Institute and the COVID-19 Eviction Defense Project. They collectively owe more than $20 billion to landlords.

The groups won a ruling from Friedrich in May declaring that the CDC's eviction ban unlawful, but an appeals court blocked an effort to enforce the decision.

In June, a divided Supreme Court agreed to let the CDC moratorium remain in effect after the agency announced it would allow the ban to expire on July 31.

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued a concurring opinion saying in his view extending the CDC moratorium past July 31 would need "clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation)."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

After being asked again by Biden to reconsider and under pressure from Democrats in Congress, the CDC reversed course on Tuesday and issued a slightly narrower eviction ban, replacing the nationwide moratorium that expired Saturday at midnight after Congress failed to approve an extension.

The new 60-day ban protects millions of renters from eviction and covers counties with substantial or high COVID-19 transmission rates. The ban currently applies to 85% of U.S. counties and more than 90% of the population.

Latest comments

CDC is not anymore medicine related but a marxism political organism 😤
If Cdc pays the rent, it is fine. Otherwise, it is illegal.
This eviction bans prolonged actions are forcing landlords into bankruptcy. They still have mortgage payments in many cases, taxes and maintenance. Their loss of these homes will take them off the market indefinitely and exacerbate the affordable home issue. From what I've seen, many of these homes are going to need significant repairs before being rented again. My experience as a landlord is that EVERY time I had to evict a tennant for being behind 6 months on rent, was extreme destruction of houses and loads of trash that you wouldn't believe. people angry over getting evicted and breaking toilets, punching holes in walls, burned carpeting, broken windows, doors and appliances gone! That's what the affordable housing situation will look like once evictions start. But it is a move forward, and needs to start as soon as possible.
communism is coming and soon poverty and soup lines
is this comment from 1913?
So are you guys taking care of the people that own the mortages? No? The cdc isnt a governing body unless they pay our checks they cant tell us what to do. Same goes for government. We pay all these organizations
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.