Please try another search
Since September, ’14, the Energy sector has gotten crushed and basic commodities have followed.
When this post was written in May ’15, the promise to readers was that you would be kept updated on the trend in Energy sector estimates.
Here are two spreadsheets that – thanks to Greg Harrison at Thomson Reuters – can be shared:
1.This spreadsheet (FC – Energy Sector) shows the Energy sector by market cap weight last fall. (This s/sheet needs to be updated, but materially, I doubt if the relative weights have changed all that much).
Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) and Chevron (NYSE:CVX) are the lion’s share of the Energy sector, representing approximately 40% of the Energy sector’s total earnings weight, and likely an equivalent market cap.
2.) This spreadsheet (FC – Energy estimate trends) shows how the Energy sector’s expected earnings growth (or earnings decline) has trended over the last 6 months, when looking at forward quarters.
The key quarters I’m focused on are the Q4 ’15, Q1 ’16 and Q2 ’16 quarters right now, since those quarters are lapping the collapse of the price of crude oil, and thus you would think if there was some hope for stabilization of crude oil, the forward estimates would start to reflect that expected growth.
Alas, that seems not to be the case. On the Energy estimate trends spreadsheet, Q4 ’15 and Q1 ’16 expected growth estimates are still declining about 3% per week, while Q2, ’16 is still deteriorating at a rate of 5% per week.
To see some erosion in forward quarters and forward estimates is not unusual, but to see it when readers should expect much easier comparisons thanks to the price collapse of crude oil in Q4 ’14 leaves me uneasy.
Energy and commodities, given their incredible collapse over the last few months, could bounce hard at any time, i.e. your proverbial violent, bear-market rally.
However, the way I read the numbers and tea leaves, given the continued deterioration at a rapid clip in the forward estimates, for Q4 ’15 and into 1H ’16, crude still looks “lower for longer”. Some technicians now see a bottom for crude in the low $30s.
What is interesting, looking at the stocks, is that Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB), had a good quarter for Q2 ’15, and the stock is really trying to hang on to the upward sloping trend line, in the low $80s off the March, 2009 low. Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) too. Exxon reports its Q2 ’15 quarter on Friday, July 31, ’15. Looking at the “Energy Sector” link above, if readers would simply own Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Schlumberger and Halliburton, readers would own 51% of the market cap of the Energy sector in just those 4 stocks. (Long SLB, HAL)
If crude oil would break the December ’14 – January ’15 lows in the low $40s, I might start to nibble into a few more of these names.
If I were to rank each of the above stocks for either a positive prospective return over the next 18 – 24 months, or out-performance within the Energy sector:
1.) Exxon Mobil
2.) Schlumberger
3.) Halliburton
4.) Chevron
As always, this is just a personal opinion, and I write my posts as much to try and clarify and solidify my own thinking about an investment issue, as to persuade readers one way or another.
Amid upcoming central bank meetings and crucial macroeconomic data releases, market sentiment is poised for potential shifts. While broader market indexes may continue to...
This year, the S&P 500 has seen a remarkable streak of 17 new all-time highs, outpacing many previous years. Notably, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has stakes in two...
It had to end eventually. Whether last week’s shift in the pole position endures is something else entirely. But for the moment, US equities are no longer leading the horse race...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.