Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

GAO sees room for improvement in bank cyber security exams

Published 07/02/2015, 04:28 PM
Updated 07/02/2015, 04:35 PM
© Reuters. An illustration picture shows projection of binary code on man holding aptop computer in Warsaw

By Suzanne Barlyn

(Reuters) - U.S. banking regulators must hire and train more examiners with technology expertise so they can give more useful cyber security recommendations to small and mid-sized banks, a federal watchdog agency has warned.

A new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office identified the issue as one of several that banking regulators need to address as cyber security threats become more prevalent and sophisticated.

For example, the names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses of some 83 million household and small business account holders were exposed last year when computer systems at JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM) were compromised by hackers, one of the biggest data breaches in history.

Multiple U.S. regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Federal Reserve, examine banks and other financial institutions that take deposits. Examiners' findings may include how the institutions can improve their cyber security practices.

Each of the regulators employs dozens of examiners with specialized technology expertise, but typically assigns those examiners to the largest banking institutions, the GAO said.

Examiners with "little to no" information technology expertise generally examine small and mid-sized banks. Their findings may not be as "specific or useful" as those from more experienced counterparts, the GAO said.

The various regulators have been trying to improve their oversight of bank technology, the GAO noted. For example, the FDIC imposed a four-course training requirement for examiners in 2010 to boost their technology know-how. Three-quarters of examiners had completed between one and three courses as of the end of 2014.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Among the GAO's other concerns: regulators are not collecting and storing technology exam findings in a way that makes it easy to search industry-wide trends.

The regulators, in letters to the GAO, said they are ramping up their systems for categorizing the data.

Many U.S. credit unions are also vulnerable to cyber threats from outside vendors that help run their businesses because their overseer, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) lacks authority to review technology practices of those companies, the GAO said.

The GAO has long been pushing to expand the NCUA's authority. But credit unions themselves and their vendors have been resistant to the idea, calling it a regulatory overreach.

The NCUA is the only federal banking regulator that does not have the power to examine third-party vendors, which range from large companies such as Fiserv (NASDAQ:FISV) or Diebold, to small companies that only serve credit unions.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.