Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Nestle defends 'Kit Kat' campaign against Atari 'Breakout' lawsuit

Published 08/18/2017, 12:05 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Illustration photo of a Kit Kat chocolate bar

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - Nestle SA (S:NESN) on Friday paddled back claims in a new lawsuit in which Atari SA (PA:ATAR) accused the Swiss food company of pilfering its classic 1970s video game "Breakout" to help sell Kit Kat chocolate-covered wafer bars.

Nestle damaged Atari's goodwill and reputation on Facebook (NASDAQ:FB), Twitter and television by exploiting the name, look and feel of "Breakout," it said in a copyright and trademark infringement complaint filed on Thursday in San Francisco,

Atari said Nestle and its U.S. and U.K. affiliates did this to whet the appetites of "nostalgic Baby Boomers, Generation X, and even today's Millennial and post-Millennial 'gamers.'"

A spokeswoman for Nestle UK said: "We are aware of the lawsuit in the U.S. and will defend ourselves strongly against these allegations."

Kit Kat was first manufactured in 1935.

"Breakout" was created by Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) co-founder Steve Wozniak with help from fellow co-founder Steve Jobs as a successor to "Pong," and requires a player to knock down rows of colored bricks with a paddle.

Nestle simply replaced the bricks with brown Kit Kat bars, used in a Kit Kate Bites commercial titled "Kit Kat: Breakout," showing adults and children using paddles to knock the bars down, according to Atari.

Atari said it "had to have been obvious" to Nestle that its "heist" of Atari intellectual property rights was illegal.

"Nestle has no excuse," Atari said.

The Kit Kat Bites ad ran only in the United Kingdom and no longer runs, the Nestles spokeswoman said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Atari is seeking three times Nestle's profits from the alleged infringement, plus triple and punitive damages.

The case is Atari Interactive Inc v Nestle SA et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 17-04803.

Latest comments

Interesting
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.