Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Go team! Top court to hear cheerleader uniform copyright case

Published 05/02/2016, 10:06 AM
Updated 05/02/2016, 10:10 AM
© Reuters. Cheerleaders make their way down 6th Ave during the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade in New York

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether the stripes, zigzags, chevrons and colors on uniforms worn by cheerleaders across the country can be copyrighted under federal law.

The court will review an August 2015 ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati that revived a lawsuit by Varsity Brands Inc, one of the largest U.S. makers of cheerleader uniforms, accusing rival Star Athletica LLC of infringing on five of its designs.

The appeals court entered a judgment in Varsity's favor as to whether its designs were "copyrightable pictorial, graphic or sculptural works."

It also revived several state law claims, including whether Star violated Tennessee's unfair competition law. That decision reversed a March 2014 ruling in favor of Star by U.S. District Judge Robert Cleland in Memphis, Tennessee.

Varsity, based in Memphis, holds copyrights for various cheerleader uniform designs. It sued for copyright infringement when Star sought to enter the market in 2010.

Chesterfield, Missouri-based Star countered that the designs in question should not have been copyrighted.

Under copyright law, a design feature is only subject to copyright if it is substantially separate from the product to which it is attached, whether it be clothing or other items such as furniture. Star says the chevrons and other design embellishments are essential elements of cheerleader uniforms and therefore cannot be copyrighted.

The court is likely to hear arguments and decide the case in its next term, which begins in October and ends in June 2017.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The case is Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands Inc, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 15-866.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.