Get 40% Off
🎁 Free Gift Friday: Copy Legendary Investors' Portfolios in One ClickCopy for Free

Pentagon official upbeat on streamlining U.S. military acquisitions

Published 10/24/2014, 05:22 PM
Updated 10/24/2014, 05:30 PM
© Reuters Sunrise over the Capitol on the second day of the government shutdown in Washington

By Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon and Congress have better-than-ever odds of reaching agreement on how to streamline myriad overlapping laws that slow the process for buying military equipment and services, a top Defense Department official said.

"I am optimistic," Andrew Hunter, a former congressional aide who helped draft many of those laws before joining the Pentagon four years ago, told reporters on Thursday. He said he saw emerging consensus among industry, lawmakers and defense officials about the need for changes.

Hunter, who runs the Pentagon's joint rapid acquisition initiative, has also led a drive to simplify current laws, which U.S. arms buyer Frank Kendall has said put "an extraordinary and unnecessarily complex burden on our program managers and staff."

U.S. defense officials have been in talks with congressional committees in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and hope to submit some reform legislation as part of the fiscal 2016 budget process, said Hunter, who is moving to a job with the Center for Strategic and International Studies next month.

"We've come up with some proposals that we hope will be favorably received," he said. Hunter said the goal was to build on some key legislation already in place while giving program managers more flexibility to focus on the main issues.

The Pentagon initiative dovetails with fresh efforts by the House and Senate armed services committees to reform the slow, cumbersome U.S. military acquisition process and reverse years of schedule delays, cost overruns and other challenges.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Big weapons makers like Lockheed Martin Corp, Boeing Co and Northrop Grumman Corp, are keeping a close eye on efforts to reform a system at a time when the industry is grappling with a downturn in military spending.

Hunter said the idea was to tailor the acquisition process to focus on key priorities and move away from a compliance mindset.

The Defense Department's rapid acquisition effort has responded to about 500 joint service requests over the past decade, plus another 500 handled by individual military services.

About 30 requests were still in the works, he said, citing continued demand for intelligence and surveillance equipment, biometrics and systems to combat roadside bombs.

He said the Pentagon's work to outfit the Navy ship MV Cape Ray with special equipment to use for destruction of Syrian chemical agents took months, not years, and was an "exemplar" of how to quickly meet the military's urgent battlefield needs.

The biggest hurdle to reaching agreement on making current laws more flexible would be winning the trust of lawmakers concerned about a repeat of multibillion-dollar acquisition failures such as the Army's Future Combat Systems and the Marine Corps' Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle program, Hunter said.

"I see that that's an obstacle," he said. "When you're arguing for flexibility, you're basically saying 'Trust me.' And then the issue is: 'But what about the time you screwed up.'"

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal; editing by Gunna Dickson)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.