We start with the Eurozone where the central bank is currently in the process of designing a fresh €500bn securities purchase program. There are multiple options on the table and the central bank is having staff run through a number of scenarios. Asset classes and asset quality scenarios run the gamut - from AAA assets only to everything from BBB- and up. The possibilities include government bonds only as well as a mix also containing private credit. This is all in addition to the ABS and covered bond buying programs already in place.
But here comes the tough part - risk sharing. The ECB is looking at three possibilities:
Method-1. The full amount of securities purchased is shared based on each member-state ownership of the ECB (capital subscriptions). This is how risk has been shared so far on purchases by the central bank. It would be similar to the so-called Securities Market Program (SMP), which is how the ECB originally got stuck with defaulted Greek debt. Of course the Germans, with their 26% exposure to the ECB, are quite unhappy about this.
Method-2. Another option on the table is to run bond purchases similarly to the so-called emergency liquidity assistance (ELA). In such a program "any costs of, and the risks arising from, the provision of ELA are incurred by the relevant NCB" (NCB stands for National Central Bank, such as the Bank of Italy for example). In such structure, each NCB would buy some prescribed amount of its nation's government bonds and assume all the risk of these purchases. Thus the Bank of Italy, not the ECB, would assume all the risk for Italian government bonds it purchases via this program.
While this option would appease Germany, such action would edge closer to a decentralized Eurozone, risking the disintegration of the monetary union. At the same time it also doesn't completely segregate the risk because many periphery NCBs owe the Eurosystem money via TARGET2. That means if one of the NCBs becomes insolvent due to an over-concentrated exposure to its national bonds, it could still be damaging to the ECB's stakeholders.
Method-3. The third option would apply Method-1 of risk sharing (above) up to some amount of purchases (let's say the first €250bn), after which the ECB reverts to Method-2 (above) for the remaining purchases.
At this point it's all about picking the "lesser evil". Any large government bond purchase program in the euro area creates a moral hazard, removing the incentives for fiscal discipline. With interest rates at historical lows driven by central bank purchases, politicians are likely to institute new spending programs - such as the ones that brought about the Eurozone crisis.
Nevertheless the ECB has little choice at this point as deflation knocks at the door. The area's CPI is now in the red as France is about to enter deflation.
… and longer dated inflation expectations are collapsing.
5y5y forward inflation swap rate:
Furthermore, the programs deployed thus far, such as TLTRO, have been simply inadequate to address these rising deflationary pressures. One way or another, quantitative easing in the Eurozone is now inevitable.
Consolidated Eurosystem balance sheet:
Partially related to the discussion above, market-implied UK overnight rate projection shows no BOE rate hike until 2016. The UK has caught the Eurozone’s deflation risk bug.
Bitcoin (BTC-eUSD) was hammered in Sunday low-volume trading (down 9%) as it tests a new support level. What a spectacular burst of a speculative bubble – some 60% decline from last summer.
This may offend some bitcoin bugs but it’s quite timely.
US treasury curve has flattened to 2009 levels (30yr - 2yr spread) on lower inflation expectations.
In fact the US 5yr/5yr forward inflation swap rate (chart below) is at record lows.
Flatter yield curve is one of the reasons for US bank share underperformance. Of course latest regulatory measures are not helping profitability much either.
In part driven by regulatory pressures (such as the liquidity ratio), banks are loading up on treasuries and agency bonds. Holdings are at record levels.
The other big holders of MBS are REITs. I know many out there love this product. But keep in mind that REITs are running a serious negative convexity exposure and represent a leveraged rate bet. No worries, rates are never going up.
In credit-land, non-energy commodity HY spreads are widening also. Here is the spread between the CS Metals & Minerals and the CS HY Index.
Now a few updates on the energy markets:
1. As of Sunday night, WTI futures are down 1.75%, probing the $47.50 support level.
2. Guggenheim is comparing the mid-80s oil plunge scenario to the current situation. A repeat will take crude down to $34/bbl – scary.
Source: Guggenheim
3. We are starting to see more crude oil contango arb - the floating oil storage is back.
Finally, some food for thought – 3 items on the menu.
1. This is a bit dated but fewer young people in the US are getting their driver’s license. Older people are keeping theirs longer.
Source: @SolarConstant , @asymco, @BenedictEvans, @NickatFP
2. Americans are not saving enough. According to the WSJ, “only 38% of Americans could cover a $500 repair bill or a $1,000 ER visit with their savings.”
3. Cars are getting safer. Apparently guns (or those who use them) are not.
Disclaimer:
The Daily Shot list is maintained at FreeLists.org, which has an ugly interface but is quite reliable and has been safely delivering newsletters like this for over a decade. E-mail addresses are protected and NEVER shared with anyone. If you have received the Daily Shot in error please notify me by replying or simply unsubscribe per instructions above.
All content provided by the Daily Shot is for informational and educational purposes only and is not meant to represent trade or investment recommendations. The Daily Shot is not produced by any entity that is registered as an investment adviser with any federal or state regulatory agency.